MedPath

Mechanisms of Fall Resistance to Diverse Slipping Conditions

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Slipping and Falls
Interventions
Other: Slips on Slopes
Other: Slips on Turns
Registration Number
NCT03758040
Lead Sponsor
University of Nebraska
Brief Summary

Using movement analysis, the investigators will determine the relationships between diverse slip conditions, reactive responses to slips from those conditions, and slip vulnerability across the gait cycle to generate new data that may guide future interventions.

Detailed Description

Recent evidence suggests most slip-related falls in daily life happen in diverse slipping conditions where the ground is not level, or the person is turning or changing direction. While slips that occur during straight walking on level ground and the responses to those slips are relatively well understood, very little is known about slips that occur while walking on slopes or curved paths and which reactive responses are effective to prevent falls in such conditions. This limits the ability of clinicians to incorporate a diverse range of slipping experiences into fall prevention interventions. Understanding how reactive responses and slip vulnerability depend on diverse slip conditions may guide future interventions that promote a more general fall resistance to the broader range of slips we encounter in the real environment. Thus, the objective of this research project is to determine the impact of turns and slopes on reactive movements and fall vulnerability. The aims of this study are (1) to determine the effects of path curvature on reactive movements and slip vulnerability at different times in the gait cycle, and (2) to determine the effects of ground slope on reactive movements and slip vulnerability at difference times in the gait cycle. The investigators hypothesize that diverse slipping conditions will change the reactive responses involving protective stepping and arm swing. In addition, the investigators hypothesize that the distinct dynamics of turns and slopes produce maximum vulnerability to slips at different times in the gait cycle compared to slips during straight walking on level ground. To evaluate these aims, the investigators will administer slip perturbations on slopes that vary in both magnitude and direction, on curved paths that vary in curvature, and with slip onset that varies across early, middle, and late stance. Understanding the relationships between diverse slipping conditions, reactive responses, slip severity and fall vulnerability may guide future research and training interventions towards more comprehensive fall resistance ability.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
42
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age 19-35
Exclusion Criteria
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Peripheral arterial disease
  • Knee osteoarthritis
  • Vertigo
  • Meniere's disease
  • Chronic dizziness
  • History of back or lower extremity injury
  • Surgery that affects mobility
  • Neurological disease that limits the ability to walk

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Slips on SlopesSlips on SlopesSlips administered during walking on sloped ground of 5.0 or 10.0 degrees mediolaterally or anteroposteriorly, or flat ground, in early middle or late stance. For mediolateral slopes, slips will be administered to the uphill or downhill foot.
Slips on TurnsSlips on TurnsSlips administered during walking on a curved paths of radii 1.0, or 2.0 meters in early, middle or late stance to the inside or outside foot.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Fall RateUp to 4 hours

Percentage of trials which result in a fall. Falls are classified when a load cell embedded in the harness system measures support forces exceeding 30% body weight.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Slipping foot distanceUp to 4 hours

The distance travelled by the slipping foot relative to the center of mass following the administered slip perturbation

Reactive stepping response timeUp to 4 hours

Duration of time between the onset of the administered slip perturbation and the placement of the reactive stepping response

Reactive stepping response placementUp to 4 hours

Position of the placement of the reactive stepping response relative to the center of mass following the administered slip perturbation

Trunk maximum angular momentumUp to 4 hours

The maximum angular momentum of the trunk following the administered slip perturbation

Reactive arm swing momentum changeUp to 4 hours

The change in arm momentum between the onset of the administered slip perturbation and the end of the slip

Slipping foot maximum velocityUp to 4 hours

The maximum velocity of the slipping foot relative to the center of mass following the administered slip perturbation

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Biomechanics Research Building

🇺🇸

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath