Compairing two cognitive aids
- Conditions
- anesthetic emergencies
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON21025
- Lead Sponsor
- none
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Pending
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 24
Inclusion Criteria
voluntary teams consisting of a consultant anesthesiologist and anesthetic nurse with a third medical professional
Exclusion Criteria
clinical inactive personnel
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Which emergency manual is most easy to use with the least missed critical actions and therefore improve patient care during anesthetic emergencies
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The use of an emergency manual will show less missed critical actions during anesthetic emergencies compared to not using an emergency manual at all.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie cognitive aid efficacy in anesthetic emergencies?
How do cognitive aids compare to standard-of-care in managing anesthetic crises?
Are there specific biomarkers that predict response to cognitive aids in anesthesia?
What adverse events are associated with cognitive aid use in emergency anesthetic scenarios?
What combination therapies are being explored alongside cognitive aids for anesthetic emergencies?