Comparison of safety and efficacy of two regional anaesthesia techniques for pain relief after breast surgeries.
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- postoperative analgesia
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/02/011757
- Lead Sponsor
- Regional cancer centre
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 41
Inclusion Criteria
1.ASA I,II,
2.BMI 18 - 35 kg/m2
3.scheduled for Modified Radical Mastectomy
4.informed written consent were included in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
pre existing local site infection,coagulopathy , morbid obesity(BMI >35),allergy to local anaesthetic,spine or chest wall deformity,pregnant women were excluded from the study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method umerical Rating Scale, 24 hr. Morphine , Paracetamol consumption,Secondary outcome safety of blocks ,all patients were monitored for any block related complication ,pnemothorax, hypotension,local anaethetic toxicity,vascular puncture, intrathecal spread or the drug .Timepoint: Numerical Rating Scale, 24 hr. Morphine , Paracetamol consumption
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method COMPLICATIONS DUE TO THE BLOCK PROCEDURE, BLOCK FAILURE, PLEURAL PUNCTURE,VASCULAR PUNCTURE,PNEUMOTHORAX,LOCAL ANAESTHETIC TOXICITYTimepoint: immediately after block, 10 minutes,20minutes,30 minutes after the block,postoperative period ,1hour,2hours 4hours ,6hours after surgery.