Corneal Crosslinking in Patients With Keratoconus and Post-Refractive Ectasia
- Conditions
- KeratoconusPost-Refractive Ectasia
- Interventions
- Device: UVX light
- Registration Number
- NCT01143389
- Lead Sponsor
- Price Vision Group
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of using riboflavin and UV light to treat progressive keratoconus or post-refractive corneal ectasia.
- Detailed Description
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate two riboflavin-dosing regimens for corneal collagen cross-linking to slow the progressive changes in corneal curvature in eyes with progressive keratoconus or post-refractive ectasia.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 510
-
10 years of age or older
-
Having documented ectasia on topography or tomography after previous refractive surgery OR progressive keratoconus defined as one or more of the following changes over a period of 36 months or less before randomization:
- An increase of ≥ 1.00 D in the steepest keratometry value (or sim K)
- An increase of ≥ 1.00 D in regular astigmatism evaluated by subjective manifest refraction
- A myopic shift (decrease in the spherical equivalent) of ≥ 0.50 D on subjective manifest refraction
- Documented decrease in visual acuity associated with irregular astigmatism and topographic features of ectasia.
-
Subjects with keratoconus diagnosis only:
a. Axial topography consistent with keratoconus b. Presence of central or inferior steepening on the Pentacam map. c. Presence of one or more slit lamp findings associated with keratoconus, such as: i. Fleischer ring ii. Vogt striae iii. Corneal thinning iv. Corneal scarring
-
Contact Lens Wearers Only: Removal of contact lenses for the required period of time prior to the screening refraction:
Contact Lens Type Minimum Discontinuation Time Soft 3 Days Soft Extended Wear 1 Week Soft Toric 2 Weeks Rigid gas permeable 2 Weeks
-
Signed written informed consent
-
-
Any keratoconus patient over 21 years of age without evidence of progression of his corneal deformity.
-
Patients with excessively thin corneas. 3. Previous ocular condition in the eyes to be treated that may predispose the eye for future complications, for example:
a. History of corneal disease (e.g., herpes simplex, herpes zoster keratitis, recurrent erosion syndrome, corneal melt, corneal dystrophy, etc.) b. Clinically significant corneal scarring in the proposed treatment zone 4. A history of chemical injury or delayed epithelial healing in the eye(s) to be treated.
-
A known sensitivity to treatment medications. 6. Patients with a current condition that, in the treating physician's opinion, would interfere with or prolong epithelial healing.
-
Pregnancy (including plan to become pregnant) or lactation during the course of the study
-
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Riboflavin 0.1% eyedrops every 5 minutes UVX light The eye will be irradiated for 30 minutes with UVX light, during which time instillation of riboflavin will continue (1 drop every 5 minutes for this arm). Riboflavin 0.1% eyedrops every 2 minutes UVX light The eye will be irradiated for 30 minutes with UVX light, during which time instillation of riboflavin will continue (1 drop every 2 minutes for this arm). Riboflavin 0.1% eyedrops every 5 minutes Riboflavin The eye will be irradiated for 30 minutes with UVX light, during which time instillation of riboflavin will continue (1 drop every 5 minutes for this arm). Riboflavin 0.1% eyedrops every 2 minutes Riboflavin The eye will be irradiated for 30 minutes with UVX light, during which time instillation of riboflavin will continue (1 drop every 2 minutes for this arm).
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Maximum Keratometry From Baseline to 6 Months After Treatment 6 months Change in maximum keratometry (Kmax) between baseline and 6 months after treatment, measured by corneal tomography.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) 6 months Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) reported in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). Lower numbers represent better vision; 0.0 corresponds to 20/20 vision. Each increase of 0.1 on the logMAR scale corresponds to one less line read on the eye chart.
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA) 6 months Uncorrected distance visual acuity reported in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units. Lower numbers represent better vision; 0.0 corresponds to 20/20 vision without any type of correction such as glasses. Each increase of 0.1 on the logMAR scale corresponds to one less line read on the eye chart.
Pachymetry 6 months Minimum corneal thickness measured by corneal tomography
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Price Vision Group
🇺🇸Indianapolis, Indiana, United States