跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05332327
NCT05332327已完成不适用

Comparison of the Accuracy of Different Periodontal Probes for Peri-implant Pocket Registration

Malmö University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2020年9月8日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
50
试验地点
1
主要终点
peri-implant probing pocket depth

研究概览

简要总结

Various types of periodontal probes (e.g., metal probes, plastic/bendable probes, electronic periodontal probes) are used for peri-implant pocket depth registration; however, depending on the shape and size of the prosthetic restoration an accurate peri-implant pocket registration might be impeded with standard metal probes. There is currently no systematic assessment of which probe is more accurate in peri-implant pocket registration. Therefore, peri-implant pocket registration of 50 patients with a screw-retained prosthetic restoration will be recorded with 3 different periodontal probes; i.e., with a metal probe, with a plastic probe, and with an automatic periodontal probe, before and after removal of the prosthetic restoration.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • screw-retained prosthetic implant restoration

排除标准

  • cemented prosthetic implant restoration

结局指标

主要结局

peri-implant probing pocket depth

时间窗: 1 day (single measurement)

peri-implant probing pocket depth in mm

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Malmö University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Kristina Bertl

Principal Investigator

Malmö University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验