Investigating Accelerated Learning in Healthy Subjects
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 撤回
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Associative Memory assessed by a Verbal Paired-Associate memory test
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether it is possible to accelerate learning and improve associative memory performance in healthy subjects, by (1) applying transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) during a verbal paired-associate learning task and by (2) optimizing the learning method with repeated retrieval practice.
详细描述
Associative memory refers to remembering the association between two items, such as a face and a name or a word in English and the same word in another language. It is not only important for learning, but it is also one of the first aspects of memory performance that is impacted by aging and by Alzheimer׳s disease. For decades, neuroscientists have investigated associative learning and memory and ways to accelerate and enhance associative learning and memory.
Transcranial Direct Current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive and painless electrical stimulation technique that has demonstrated to accelerate learning and improve memory in some studies. Previous research has also emphasized the importance of repeated retrieval practice as a way to accelerate learning and enhance associative memory performance. Therefore, this study will examine the effect of repeated retrieval practice on associative memory performance by using two versions of an associative memory task.
To investigate whether it is possible to accelerate learning and improve associative memory using tDCS and repeated retrieval practice, the performance in a Verbal Paired-Associate memory task during the first visit and 1 week after will be compared for four study groups. The first group will get active tDCS during a version of the verbal paired-associate learning task with repeated retrieval practice. The second group will get active tDCS during a version of the verbal paired-associate learning task without repeated retrieval practice. The third group will get sham tDCS during a version of the verbal paired-associate learning task with repeated retrieval practice and the fourth group will get Sham tDCS during a version of the verbal paired-associate learning task without repeated retrieval practice.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Basic Science
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 35 Years(Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Age: 18-35 years
- •Native English Speaker
排除标准
- •History of severe head injuries,epileptic insults, or heart disease
- •Severe psychiatric disorders and severe untreated medical problems.
- •Acquainted with the foreign language used in the learning task
- •Contraindications for tDCS (pregnant women, implanted devices)
研究组 & 干预措施
active tDCS with repeated retrieval practice
active tDCS with verbal paired-associate learning task with repeated retrieval practice
干预措施: tDCS (Device)
active tDCS with repeated retrieval practice
active tDCS with verbal paired-associate learning task with repeated retrieval practice
干预措施: Verbal paired-associate learning task (Behavioral)
active tDCS without repeated retrieval practice
active tDCS with verbal paired-associate learning task without repeated retrieval practice
干预措施: tDCS (Device)
active tDCS without repeated retrieval practice
active tDCS with verbal paired-associate learning task without repeated retrieval practice
干预措施: Verbal paired-associate learning task (Behavioral)
Sham tDCS with repeated retrieval practice
sham tDCS with verbal paired-associate learning task with repeated retrieval practice
干预措施: Verbal paired-associate learning task (Behavioral)
Sham tDCS without repeated retrieval practice
shamtDCS with verbal paired-associate learning task without repeated retrieval practice
干预措施: Verbal paired-associate learning task (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
Associative Memory assessed by a Verbal Paired-Associate memory test
时间窗: baseline and 1 week after the tDCS
Changes in performance in the Verbal Paired-Associate memory task is compared between the 4 groups (1. tDCS+verbal paired-associate learning task with repeated retrieval practice, 2. tDCS + verbal paired-associate learning task without repeated retrieval practice, 3. Sham tDCS+verbal paired-associate learning task with repeated retrieval practice, 4. Sham tDCS + verbal paired-associate learning task without repeated retrieval practice) to investigate the influence of tDCS and learning method on Associative Memory
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Sven Vanneste
Associate professor
The University of Texas at Dallas
