Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03031847
NCT03031847CompletedNot Applicable

Cardiac Resynchronization in the Elderly: Piloting Pacemaker vs. Defibrillator Therapy (Randomized Trial)

Samir Saba6 sites in 1 country102 target enrollmentStarted: March 21, 2017Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
102
Locations
6
Primary Endpoint
Enrollment

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This pilot will enroll 50 HF patients (age ≥ 75 years) undergoing CRT device implantation at the hospitals of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Duke University, Ohio State University, and the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System. Patients will be randomized to CRT-P versus CRT-D and followed until study end. Rates of patient screening, enrollment, randomization, and retention as well as cost of care will be examined. The results of this pilot study will inform the design of a large pivotal non-inferiority trial and will be necessary for its success. Patients who refuse participation in the randomized pilot trial will be asked to enroll in a prospective observational cohort. Characteristics of patients who choose CRT-P vs. CRT-D will be compared and patients' level of satisfaction with their device decision will be measured.

Detailed Description

The goal of this study is to pilot test a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing the survival and quality of life (QOL) of older patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) pacemaker (CRT-P) versus defibrillator (CRT-D) therapy. This pilot will enroll 50 HF patients (age ≥ 75 years) undergoing CRT device implantation at the hospitals of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Duke University, Ohio State University, and the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System. Patients will be randomized to CRT-P versus CRT-D and followed until study end. Rates of patient screening, enrollment, randomization, and retention as well as cost of care will be examined. The results of this pilot study will inform the design of a large pivotal non-inferiority trial and will be necessary for its success. Patients who refuse participation in the randomized pilot trial will be enrolled and followed as part of a prospective observational cohort. Characteristics of patients who choose CRT-P vs. CRT-D will be compared and patients' level of satisfaction with their device decision will be measured.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
75 Years to — (Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Age >/= 75 years
  • •Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% by cardiac imaging including echocardiogram, nuclear imaging, cardiac catheterization, or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
  • •QRS width >120 ms on surface electrocardiogram
  • •New York Heart Association class II, III, or ambulatory IV for Heart Failure (HF)
  • •Patient undergoing de novo CRT device implantation of CRT-D device change-out for battery depletion

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patient within 40 days of acute myocardial infarction
  • •Patient within 3 months of cardiac revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery)
  • •Patient with prior history of cardiac arrest or documented sustained ventricular arrhythmia
  • •Patient with expected longevity < 1 year
  • •Patient not on optimal medical therapy for HF management including when tolerated β-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers
  • •Patient not planning to have his/her follow-up at participating institution
  • •Patient unable or unwilling to sign a written informed consent
  • •Patient's with dementia that are unable to consent for themselves
  • •Participating in any other clinical trials (observational/registries allowed)

Arms & Interventions

Randomized- Defibrillator (CRT-D)

Other

Cardiac resynchronization therapy Defibrillator

Intervention: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (Device)

Observational- Pacemaker (CRT-P)

Other

Cardiac resynchronization therapy Pacemaker (CRT-P): Patients in this arm declined randomization in the trial and elected to participate in the observational registry

Intervention: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacemaker (Device)

Randomized- Pacemaker (CRT-P)

Other

Cardiac resynchronization therapy Pacemaker

Intervention: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacemaker (Device)

Observational- Defibrillator (CRT-D)

Other

Cardiac resynchronization therapy Defibrillator (CRT-D): Patients in this arm declined randomization in the trial and elected to participate in the observational registry

Intervention: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Enrollment

Time Frame: At 1 year after start of the study

Rates of enrollment of participants in this randomized trial

Secondary Outcomes

  • Health Care Cost(At 6 months after enrollment)
  • QOL(At 6 months after enrollment)
  • QOL2(At 6 months after enrollment)
  • Retention(At 6 months after enrollment)

Investigators

Sponsor
Samir Saba
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Samir Saba

Associate Professor; Associate Chief of Cardiology; Director of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

University of Pittsburgh

Study Sites (6)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials