MedPath

Clinical Assessment of a Daily Wear Monthly Replacement Silicone Hydrogel Toric Contact Lens

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Astigmatism
Refractive Errors
Registration Number
NCT05211739
Lead Sponsor
Alcon Research
Brief Summary

The purpose of this clinical study is to assess the clinical performance of an investigational toric soft contact lens compared to a commercially available toric contact lens in a crossover dispense trial when worn in a daily wear modality for 30 days, each study lens type.

Detailed Description

Subjects will be randomized to 1 of 2 crossover wear sequences. Subjects will be expected to attend 5 office visits, for a total individual duration of participation in the study of approximately 60 days.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
76
Inclusion Criteria
  • Successful wearers of weekly/monthly toric soft contact lenses in both eyes for a minimum of 5 days per week and 10 hours per day during the past 3 months;
  • Best corrected distance visual acuity (as determined by manifest refraction at screening) better than or equal to 20/25 Snellen in each eye.
  • Able to wear contact lenses within the range of available sphere & cylinder power and axes.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Key

Exclusion Criteria
  • Daily disposable contact lens wearers.
  • Monovision and multifocal contact lens wearers.
  • Habitual Biofinity Toric/Biofinity Toric XR contact lens wearers in the past 3 months prior to consent.
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Distance Visual Acuity (VA) With Study LensesDay 1 and Day 30, each wear period (approximately 30 days)

Visual acuity (VA) was collected for each eye individually with study lenses in place using a letter chart. VA was measured in logarithm minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). A logMAR value of 0 equates to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity (normal distance eyesight), with a lower logMAR value indicating better visual acuity. No inferences were pre-specified for the primary effectiveness endpoint; therefore, no hypothesis testing was performed.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (7)

Sabal Eye Care

🇺🇸

Longwood, Florida, United States

Drs. Giedd, P.A.

🇺🇸

Maitland, Florida, United States

Vision Health Institute

🇺🇸

Orlando, Florida, United States

Kannarr Eye Care LLC

🇺🇸

Pittsburg, Kansas, United States

Fischer Laser Eye Center

🇺🇸

Willmar, Minnesota, United States

SUNY College of Optometry Clinical Vision Research Center

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

West Bay Eye Associates

🇺🇸

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

Sabal Eye Care
🇺🇸Longwood, Florida, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.