MedPath

Infiltration Anesthesia vs. Block Anesthesia

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Tooth Extraction
Registration Number
NCT06766981
Lead Sponsor
Sinan A. Shwailiya
Brief Summary

Checking the effectiveness of the infiltration technique of local anesthetic agent as an alternative to inferior dental nerve block during tooth extraction

Detailed Description

Patients who need their Mandibular first Molar to be removed under local anaesthesia. The first group will receive 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as lingual and buccal infiltration. In comparison, the second group will receive a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block technique with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:80,000). Pain will be measured para-operatively using a verbal rating scale.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • The systemic condition must be normal.
  • Patient has no cardiovascular, metabolic, or transmitted disease.
  • The patient has a Mandibular 1st. Molar tooth indicated for extraction.
  • The tooth is non-restorable.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Chronic cardiovascular condition, metabolic, or infectious disease.
  • Pregnant women.
  • The tooth is restorable.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Verbal Pain Rating Scaleduring the intervention/procedure/surgery

Pain during tooth extraction will be measured immediately after the procedure is completed using a verbal rating scale. The zero rate will be given when the patient feels no pain; the rating degree will increase as the pain severity becomes more severe. According to the following scale:

0 No hurt

1. Slight pain

2. Moderate pain

3. Intense pain

4. Extremely painful

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

College of Dentistry, University of Babylon

🇮🇶

Hilla, Babylon, Iraq

College of Dentistry/University of Babylon

🇮🇶

Hilla, Babylon, Iraq

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath