MedPath

Resistive Diaphragmatic Training vs Volumes-Oriented Spirometer In Asthmatic Parients

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Asthma
Registration Number
NCT06869655
Lead Sponsor
Riphah International University
Brief Summary

Asthma, a chronic lung disease characterized by airway inflammation and constriction, presents ongoing challenges despite advancements in treatment. The aim of this study to deliver non-pharmacological interventions, particularly comparing resistive diaphragmatic training (RDT) and volume-oriented spirometry, to assess their efficacy in enhancing pulmonary function and functional capacity among asthmatic patients. it will compare resistive diaphragmatic training (RDT) with volume-oriented spirometry in asthmatic patients to pinpoint the superior method for enhancing lung function and daily capabilities.

Detailed Description

Asthma is a chronic lung disease characterized by airway inflammation and constriction, presents ongoing challenges despite advancements in treatment.The aim of this study is to deliver non-pharmacological interventions, comparing resistive diaphragmatic training (RDT) and volume-oriented spirometry, to assess their efficacy in enhancing pulmonary function and functional capacity among asthmatic patients. Method: This study will be conducted at "Gulab Devi Chest Hospital" Lahore, it is randomized clinical trial (RCT) which will divided into two groups: Group A include RDT along conventional physiotherapy treatment and Group B include volume-oriented spirometry along conventional physiotherapy treatment. Total 50 subjects will be recruited according inclusion and exclusions criteria by convenient sampling technique. Data collection procedure will follow standardized procedures like pre-assessment and post-assessment which will be after 6 weeks with spirometry, 6MWT, and the ACT. Hypothesis postulated that RDT will show greater mprovements in pulmonary function and functional capacity compared to volumes oriented spirometry. However, null hypothesis will suggest that there is no significant difference between the two interventions.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age range between 35 years to 50 years who must have a confirm diagnosis of asthma and FEV1% >60% & <80%, both male and female with moderate asthma. Outpatients from regional medical Centre.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Asthma patients whose condition require hospitalization asthmatic patients with physical limitation patients, with exercise-induced asthma, Asthma patients with heart dis¬ease with evidence of cardiovascular osteoarticular, inability to consent or cooperate, long-term, home oxygen therapy, active tuberculosis or other infectious disorders as well as stroke, are excluded

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
6-MWT6-weeks

For the 6MWT assessment, the participants were encouraged to walk as far as they could during 6 min over a flat 100-feet surface, and for consistency, the researchers used constant verbal cues and positive feedback to encourage the participants to complete the task. The 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) assesses aerobic capacity and functional exercise capacity by measuring the distance a person can walk in 6 minutes. Results are interpreted based on the distance walked, which correlates with functional capacity.

Asthma Control Test6-weeks

The ACT is a validated, patient-completed measure of asthma control that includes five questions that assess activity limitations, shortness of breath, nighttime symptoms, use of rescue medication, and patient overall rating of asthma control over the previous four weeks. The questions are scored from 1 (worst) to 5 (best), and the ACT score is the sum of the responses, giving a maximum best score of 25.

spirometer6-weeks

For Pulmonary Function, FEV1 will be used to assess lung function. A spirometer will be used to measure forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). The spirometer is a simple test and an essential tool in diagnosing airway obstruction. However, the variability of spirometry measurements is greater than in most other clinical laboratory tests because the result is highly dependent on the consistency of the efforts made by patients and technicians. Normal values vary based on age, sex, height, and ethnicity. Interpretations are based on comparing results to predicted values, aiding in diagnosing conditions like asthma or COPD. However, interpretation accuracy can also depend on the expertise of the interpreter and clinical context. For instance: FVC: Around 80-120% of predicted value, FEV1: Around 75-85% of predicted value and FEV1/FVC ratio: Typically \>0.7 (adults).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Gulab Devi Hospital

🇵🇰

Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath