A randomized comparision of fibreoptic guided tracheal intubation through I Gel and BlockBuster laryngeal mask airway
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 80
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To compare success rate of fibreoptic guided tracheal intubation through I-GelTM and BlockBusterTM supraglottic airway devices
研究概览
简要总结
Supraglottic airway devices fill the niche between face mask and tracheal tube in terms of anatomical position,invasiveness and airway security. Various studies exist where supraglottic airway devices have been used as a conduit for passage of endotracheal tubes. However no studies exist which compare BlockBuster LMA with IGel as a conduit for passage of fibreoptic guided endotracheal tube . This study proposes to compare the two devices (IGel and BlockBuster LMA) as conduits for fibreoptic guided endotracheal intubation
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Computer generated randomization
- 盲法
- Participant Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 65.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •ASA I-II patients, Body Mass Index <30 kg/m2 All elective surgical procedures requiring tracheal intubation Adequate mouth opening : >2 fingers Mallampati Grade 1.
排除标准
- •ASA III-V Body Mass Index>30 kg/m2 Emergency Procedures Contraindications to supraglottic airway devices.
结局指标
主要结局
To compare success rate of fibreoptic guided tracheal intubation through I-GelTM and BlockBusterTM supraglottic airway devices
时间窗: Immediately after confirmed endo tracheal intubation(confirmed by chest rise, capnogram and auscultation)
次要结局
- 1 Insertion time of supraglottic devices(2 Oropharyngeal leak pressure in neutral position)