MedPath

Choice Sets for Advance Directives

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
End Stage Renal Disease
Registration Number
NCT02209038
Lead Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Brief Summary

There is a large gap between the care seriously ill patients want and the care they receive. Advance directives (ADs) offer an opportunity for patients to express specific end-of-life preferences to avoid unwanted care. As promising as ADs may be for improving the quality of care near the end of life, rates of AD completion remain low and previous efforts to encourage their completion have had limited success. Principles of behavioral economics, such as the effects of defaults and other framing effects, may offer a novel approach to bridge the gap in end-of-life care. The goal of this study is to test whether the framing effect of expanding choice sets can increase the completion of and specification of choices within advance directives.

Detailed Description

This study has been designed as two sequential randomized trials to test two separate expanded choice set interventions, with the second randomization enrollment being contingent on results from the first. All enrolled subjects will be asked if they would like to complete an advance directive and will have been randomized to receive either an expanded answer choice set or a standard answer choice, as described in detail elsewhere. Only those subjects who express a desire to complete an advance directive from both arms will then be randomized again in a stratified fashion to receive either a standard advance directive or one with an expanded choice set for the decisions regarding life-sustaining therapy, as described in detail elsewhere.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
321
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age 18 or older
  • Proficient in English
  • Chronic hemodialysis for minimum 90 days
  • Does not currently have a living will
Exclusion Criteria
  • Blindness
  • Cognitive impairment that prohibits subject's provision of informed consent

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
advance directiveup to 4 weeks

return of a completed and signed advance directive

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12v2baseline and 3 months

change from baseline in Short Form-12v2 score at 3 months

no life-sustaining therapy preference specifiedup to 4 weeks

among all patients who complete an AD, the proportion of subjects who choose not to specify a preference for life-sustaining therapy on at least 1 clinical scenario within the AD

McGill Quality of Life Questionnairebaseline and 3 months

change from baseline in McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire at 3 months

Satisfaction with Decision Scalebaseline

satisfaction with decision scale measured at baseline after decision to complete an advance directive is made

Decisional Conflict Scaleup to 4 weeks

Decisional Conflict Scale measured immediately after completion of an advance directive

Trial Locations

Locations (15)

Lourdes-Camden

🇺🇸

Camden, New Jersey, United States

Market Street DaVita

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Philadelphia 42nd Street DaVita

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Philadelphia PMC-Lombard DaVita

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

University City DaVita

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Franklin DaVita

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

PDI Walnut Tower DaVita

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Callowhill DaVita

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

City Line DaVita

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

South Broad Street

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Scroll for more (5 remaining)
Lourdes-Camden
🇺🇸Camden, New Jersey, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.