MedPath

Results of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties in Patients Beyond Historical Indications (PUCIL)

Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Knee Disease
Interventions
Procedure: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Registration Number
NCT05749965
Lead Sponsor
Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Brief Summary

Primary objective:

To compare medial uni compartimental knee arthroplasty between patients who had a limit factor prior to the surgery ans patients who fill thé historical criteria.

Secondary objectives

1 to compare survival of medial UKA between patients with one limit factor and those with multiple limits.

2. To identify the prognosis factors of failure in medial UKA in our center during the time of our analysis (2009-2015)

Detailed Description

7 year follow up survival if no amputation or no removal of UKA for TKA

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
522
Inclusion Criteria
  • medial UKA implanted between 2009 and 2015 at the CCEG
Exclusion Criteria
  • no other UKA
  • lost to follow up
  • patient refuses

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Limit indicationsUnicompartmental knee arthroplastyObèse (BMI\>30), ACL déficiency, HKA \> 10°, flessum \>10° \[HKA : hop knee angle\]
Historical indicationsUnicompartmental knee arthroplastyPatient with a BMI between 18,5 and 30, HKA \<10°, functionnal ACL, no flessum or \<5°
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Survival of medial UKA7 years

UKA changed or replaced by TKA

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
to compare UKA survival if multiple limit indication7 years

UKA changed or replaced by TKA

to identify prognostic factors of re operation of patients with a medial UKA implanted between 2009 and 2015 at the CCEG7 years

ACL, flessum, HKA, weight

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Centre Chirurgical Emile Gallé

🇫🇷

Nancy, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath