Preoperative Assessment of Difficult Laryngoscopy Using Different Videolaryngoscopes
- Conditions
- AssessmentDifficult Airway IntubationPreoperative
- Interventions
- Device: airtraqDevice: mcgrath mac x-bladeDevice: storz c-macDevice: storz d-blade
- Registration Number
- NCT03999866
- Lead Sponsor
- Kocaeli University
- Brief Summary
preoperative assessment of difficult airways are the subject of debate. Now, measuring the thyromental distance or evaluating the mallampati score, mandible protrusion or body mass index still not 100% specifically say anything. We compare 4 different video laryngoscopes for preoperative assessment of difficult laryngoscopy.
- Detailed Description
preoperative assessment of difficult airways are the subject of debate. Now, measuring the thyromental distance or evaluating the mallampati score, mandible protrusion or body mass index still not 100% specifically say anything. all patients were pre oxygenated with 100% oxygen with nasal canulla during the whole procedure. We administered 0.07 mgr/kg remifentanil for minimum 3 minutes and continue this infusion during the procedure. The patients airway topicalized by 10% lidocaine spray. We enroll 20 patients undergoing elective surgery.
We compare 4 different video laryngoscopes for preoperative assessment of difficult laryngoscopy in the same patient. We evaluate the patient and the instructors satisfaction with the visual analogy scale and the visualization time. Demographic vary,ables and the airway characteristics of patients. We assess the cormack lehane view of these videolaryngoscopes with or without cricoid pressure. and the occurrence of gag reflex as well.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 18
- > 18 years or <60 years of age,
- body mass index < 30
- no difficult airway history or predictor,
- no respiratory tract infections for ten days,
BMI > 35, < 18 or > 60 years of age, expected difficult airway, pregnant
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SEQUENTIAL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description satisfaction of the patient storz d-blade visual analogy scale of the satisfaction of the patient was recorded satisfaction of instructor mcgrath mac x-blade visual analogy scale of the satisfaction of the instructor was recorded satisfaction of the patient mcgrath mac x-blade visual analogy scale of the satisfaction of the patient was recorded satisfaction of instructor airtraq visual analogy scale of the satisfaction of the instructor was recorded satisfaction of the patient airtraq visual analogy scale of the satisfaction of the patient was recorded satisfaction of the patient storz c-mac visual analogy scale of the satisfaction of the patient was recorded duration of view mcgrath mac x-blade duration of the visualization the vocal cords was recorded duration of view storz c-mac duration of the visualization the vocal cords was recorded satisfaction of instructor storz c-mac visual analogy scale of the satisfaction of the instructor was recorded duration of view airtraq duration of the visualization the vocal cords was recorded satisfaction of instructor storz d-blade visual analogy scale of the satisfaction of the instructor was recorded duration of view storz d-blade duration of the visualization the vocal cords was recorded
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method satisfaction of the instructor: visual analogy scale 2 minutes visual analogy scale of the satisfaction
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method duration view 10 seconds time frame from the device enter the oral cavity till the vocal cords visualized
satisfaction of the patient: visual analogy scale 2 minutes visual analogy scale of the satisfaction
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Kocaeli University School of Medicine
🇹🇷Kocaeli, Turkey