Comparison of Sedative Effect of Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam for TIVA
Early Phase 1
Not yet recruiting
- Conditions
- Choosing Better Drug Option for Sedation in Pediatric Population Intraoperatively
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT05574179
- Lead Sponsor
- Sheikh Zayed Medical College
- Brief Summary
Comparison of sedative effects of dexmedetomidine and midazolam using ramsay sedation scores intraoperatively in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair.
- Detailed Description
a randomized controlled trial to compare the sesative effects of dexmedetomidine and midazolam in pediatric population planned for inguinal herna repair under TIVA in sheikh zayed hospital rahim yar khan.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Inclusion Criteria
- ASA I and II Age 6 to 12 years Any gender
Exclusion Criteria
- ASA III and above Age less than 2 years and above 12 years Congenital heart disease Cardiac arrythmias Congenital abnormalities Respiratory disease Endocrine disorders Mental retardation Organ dysfunction Bleeding disorders Physician or family refusal Previous surgeries Allergy to any drug
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Dexnedetomidine Dexmedetomidine injection inj.dexmedetomidine midazola. Midazolam Inj.midazolam
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Dexmedetomidine is better sedative agent than midazolam in pediatric population 25 minutes
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Midazolam is better sedating agent than dexmedetomidine in pediatric population 25 minutes Midazolam and dexmedetomidine are equally good sedating agents in pediatric population 25 minutes