Comparing the Synergistic Effect of Caudal Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Versus Caudal Dexmedetomidine Only or Propofol Only in Prevention of Sevoflurane Related Emergence Agitation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Congenital Inguinal Hernia Repair
- Conditions
- Sevoflurane Agitiion in Pediatric
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT06734195
- Lead Sponsor
- Assiut University
- Brief Summary
evaluate the synergistic efficacy of propofol and caudal dexmedetomidine for postoperative EA in pediatrics aged from to 2 to 5 years maintained on sevoflurane inhalational anesthesia and scheduled for conginital inguinal hernia repair surgeries
- Detailed Description
Eligibility and type of the study: This prospective randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study will be conducted after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee and obtaining written informed consent from parents of children scheduled for conginital inguinal hernia repair procedures under general anesthesia. This study will be conducted at pediatric surgery operating theatre, Assiut University Hospitals.
Sample size:
Drugs coding and Randomization: Patients will be randomly allocated into three equal groups with the help of a computer-generated table of random numbers to receive the study drugs. One anesthesiologist, not involved in the study procedure or data collection, will prepare the study drugs in identical coded syringes. Access to these codes will be only available to one anesthesiologist who will prepare the syringes according to the study drugs used. To ensure double-blinding, the anesthetic technique and outcome data will be collected by an anesthesiologist not included in preparing study drugs or envelops coding. Also the parents will be blinded to the drug grouping of their children.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 90
- Age 2-7 years
- Both genders
- American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) physical state I-II
- Children undergoing sub-umbilical abdominal surgeries
- Guardians refusal
- Congenital anomalies at the lower spine or meninges
- Increased intracranial pressure
- Skin infection at the site of injection
- Bleeding diathesis
- Known allergy to any drugs used in this study
- Children with behavioral changes; physical or developmental delay; neurological disorder or psychological disorder.
- Children on sedative or anticonvulsant medication.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Group A (propofol group) Propofol alone 30 patients will receive propofol 1mg/kg before the start of skin closure, administered over 10 minutes and caudal block using 1 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0. 25 % plus 2 ml normal saline. Group B (caudal dexmedetomidine group) Dexmedetomidine 30 patients will receive caudal dexmedetomidine block using 1 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0. 25 % mixed with dexmedetomidie 1mic/kg diluted in 2 ml normal saline. Group C (propofol with caudal dexmedetomidine group) dexmedetomidine + propofol 30 patients will receive both propofol .5 mg/kg before the start of skin closure, administered over 10 minutes and caudal dexmedetomidine block using 1 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0. 25 % mixed with dexmedetomidie 1mic/kg diluted in 2 ml normal saline.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method postoperative EA 24 hours The incidence of postoperative emergence agitation in the study groups will be evaluated by using the (PAED Score)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.