MedPath

Threshold Suspend in Pediatrics at Home

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Type 1 Diabetes
Interventions
Device: 530G Insulin pump
Registration Number
NCT02120794
Lead Sponsor
Medtronic Diabetes
Brief Summary

The study objective is to demonstrate that home use of Threshold Suspend (TS) is not associated with glycemic deterioration in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes, as measured by change in A1C.

Detailed Description

This study is a longitudinal, multi-center trial that aims to observe the Threshold Suspend (TS) feature with a sensor-augmented insulin pump in patients 7-15 years with Type 1 diabetes. The study will measure the change in A1C from baseline over a period of one year while subjects are wearing the study pump.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
194
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Subject is age 2 to 15 at time of screening
  2. Subject has been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus and must have been diagnosed for at least one year prior to screening
  3. Subject is currently transitioning from pump therapy, with or without continued glucose monitoring (CGM), to the 530G insulin pump system.
  4. Subject is willing to perform greater than or equal to 4 finger stick blood glucose measurements daily
  5. Subject is willing to perform required sensor calibrations
  6. Subject is willing to wear the system (Pump, glucose sensors, meter) continuously throughout the study
  7. Subject is willing to upload data every 21 days from the study pump
  8. Subject must have Internet access and access to a computer system that meets the requirements for uploading the pumps. This may include use of family or friend's computer system with Internet access.
  9. Subject is using either Humalog or Novolog at time of Screening and plans to use either of those insulins throughout the study
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Subject is actively participating in an investigational study (drug or device) wherein he/she is receiving treatment from an investigational study drug or investigational study device.
  2. Women of child-bearing potential who have a positive pregnancy test at screening or plan to become pregnant during the course of the study
  3. Subject is being treated for hyperthyroidism at time of screening
  4. Subject has an abnormality (>1.8mg/dL) in creatinine at time of screening visit
  5. Subject has an abnormality (out of reference range) in thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) at time of screening visit; If TSH is out of range, Free T3 and Free T4 will be tested; subject may be included with TSH out of range as long as Free T3 and Free T4 are in normal reference range.
  6. Subject has taken any oral, injectable, or IV steroids within 8 weeks from time of screening visit, or plans to take any oral, injectable, or IV steroids during the course of the study
  7. Subject is currently abusing illicit drugs
  8. Subject is currently abusing prescription drugs
  9. Subject is currently abusing alcohol
  10. Subject is using pramlintide (Symlin) at time of screening
  11. Subject has a sickle cell disease, hemoglobinopathy; or has received red blood cell transfusion or erythropoietin within 3 months prior to time of screening
  12. Subject plans to receive red blood cell transfusion or erythropoietin over the course of study participation
  13. Subject diagnosed with current eating disorder such as anorexia or bulimia
  14. Subject has been diagnosed with chronic kidney disease that results in chronic anemia
  15. Subject is on dialysis
  16. Subject is already on a 530G system with CGM for 8 days or more.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
530G insulin pump530G Insulin pumpSubjects will use 530G insulin pump with Threshold Suspend (TS) feature for one year.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Overall Mean Change in A1CBaseline and 1 year after screening

The overall mean change in A1C from baseline to 1 year will be estimated and compared by a non-inferiority test with an A1C margin of 0.4% and a significance level of 0.025 (one-sided). Among the 136 subjects who completed the study, 132 had both baseline and end of study A1c. Therefore, primary endpoint was based on 132 subjects.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Change in A1C From Baseline to 1 Year, Stratified by Different A1c SubgroupsBaseline and 1 year after screening

Mean change in A1C from baseline to 1 year, stratified by different A1c subgroups: A1c \> 9%. Among the 132 subjects with both baseline and end of study A1c, 32 had A1c \> 9%

Trial Locations

Locations (16)

Children's Hospital Los Angeles

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

Children's Hospital of Orange County

🇺🇸

Orange, California, United States

SoCal Diabetes

🇺🇸

Torrance, California, United States

Madison Clinic for Pediatric Diabetes at UCSF

🇺🇸

San Francisco, California, United States

Stanford University

🇺🇸

Stanford, California, United States

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Yale University School of Medicine

🇺🇸

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Nemours Children's Health System

🇺🇸

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Children's Hospital and Clinics of Minnesota

🇺🇸

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

University of Colorado Health Science Center, Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes

🇺🇸

Aurora, Colorado, United States

The Pediatric and Endocrine Diabetes Specialists

🇺🇸

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Texas Children Hospital/Baylor College of Medicine

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

Sutter Institute for Medical Research Excellence in Diabetes and Endocrinology

🇺🇸

Sacramento, California, United States

Park Nicollet Clinic - International Diabetes Center

🇺🇸

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Stony Brook Children's Hospital

🇺🇸

East Setauket, New York, United States

University of Minnesota Pediatric Endocrinology Clinic

🇺🇸

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath