Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06326801
NCT06326801CompletedNot Applicable

Effect of Resistive Diaphragmatic Breathing Exercise With Pursed Lips Breathing Exercise on Pulmonary Function, Trunk Control and Functional Capacity in Sub-acute Stroke Patients

Riphah International University2 sites in 1 country27 target enrollmentStarted: September 1, 2023Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
27
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Trunk Control

Study Overview

Brief Summary

To determine whether resistive diaphragmatic breathing exercise with pursed lips breathing exercise improve pulmonary function in sub-acute ischemic stroke, To determine whether resistive diaphragmatic breathing exercise with pursed lips breathing exercise improve Trunk Control in sub-acute ischemic stroke, To determine whether resistive diaphragmatic breathing exercise with pursed lips breathing exercise improve Functional Capacity in sub-acute ischemic stroke

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
40 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Known case of cardiopulmonary disease, BP > 180/100 mmHg twice in 24 hours
  • Known case of neurological disease other than stroke, Known case of orthopedic disease i-e funnel chest, rib fractures or any other orthopedic deformity
  • Medication that would influence metabolic or cardiorespiratory responses to exercise Impaired level of consciousness, Evidence of gross cognitive impairment.

Arms & Interventions

Treatment A

Active Comparator
  1. Resistive Diaphragmatic breathing exercise
  2. Pursed lips breathing exercise
  3. Conventional stroke physiotherapy

Intervention: Resistive Diaphragmatic breathing exercise (Other)

Treatment A

Active Comparator
  1. Resistive Diaphragmatic breathing exercise
  2. Pursed lips breathing exercise
  3. Conventional stroke physiotherapy

Intervention: Conventional stroke physiotherapy (Other)

Treatment B

Active Comparator
  1. Diaphragmatic breathing exercise
  2. Pursed lips breathing exercise
  3. Conventional stroke physiotherapy

Intervention: Resistive Diaphragmatic breathing exercise (Other)

Treatment B

Active Comparator
  1. Diaphragmatic breathing exercise
  2. Pursed lips breathing exercise
  3. Conventional stroke physiotherapy

Intervention: Diaphragmatic breathing exercise (Other)

Treatment B

Active Comparator
  1. Diaphragmatic breathing exercise
  2. Pursed lips breathing exercise
  3. Conventional stroke physiotherapy

Intervention: Conventional stroke physiotherapy (Other)

Treatment A

Active Comparator
  1. Resistive Diaphragmatic breathing exercise
  2. Pursed lips breathing exercise
  3. Conventional stroke physiotherapy

Intervention: Diaphragmatic breathing exercise (Other)

Control group

Active Comparator

a) Conventional stroke physiotherapy

Intervention: Resistive Diaphragmatic breathing exercise (Other)

Control group

Active Comparator

a) Conventional stroke physiotherapy

Intervention: Diaphragmatic breathing exercise (Other)

Control group

Active Comparator

a) Conventional stroke physiotherapy

Intervention: Conventional stroke physiotherapy (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Trunk Control

Time Frame: 4weeks

Trunk performance and coordination by static and dynamic sitting balance was measured by TIS.TIS comprises 17 items, measures dynamic and static sitting balance and trunk co-ordination. The TIS total score is 0-23 points, higher scores show better performance. It takes about 6 to 16 minutes in applying TIS

pulmonary function

Time Frame: 4 weeks

The pulmonary functions Spirometer measure can be expressed as Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) and Force Vital Capacity (FVC) .

Functional Capacity

Time Frame: 4weeks

6 MWT is used for functional capacity of participants, by walking for 6 minutes. Participant walk between the point marked, as numerous periods as can in 6 minutes. The 6-minute walk (6mw) test is a reliable and valid measure of for assessing functional capacity.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials