Central Mammary Duct Excision; How to Improve the Outcome?
- Conditions
- Duct Ectasia BreastBenign Breast Disease
- Interventions
- Procedure: major duct excision
- Registration Number
- NCT04744766
- Lead Sponsor
- Alexandria University
- Brief Summary
the study compares two surgical techniques in excision of the central duct system of the breast. known also as major duct excision
- Detailed Description
first technique used is the original Hadfield techniques. the other technique is Almasad technique published in 1999. in this technique, de-epithelialization of a supraareolar area of nearly 2cm is done and elevation of the nipple areola complex is done to support the retroareolar area.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 130
females with nipple discharge / recurrent peri-ductal mastitis
- suspicion or evidence of malignancy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Hadfield technique group major duct excision central/mammary duct excision is done by the ordinary method described by Hadfield Al Masad technique group major duct excision same procedure with de-epithelization of the upper pararaeolar area
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method patient satisfaction and sensation of nipple areolar complex complications 6 months cosmetic outcome assessed via score between non-satisfied -extremely satisfied sensation is assessed via acotton bad comaring both side or nearby skin
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method complications 6 months eg nipple areolae complex (NAC) sensation, necrosis...etc
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Faculty of Medicine, Main Univeristy Hospital
🇪🇬Alexandria, Egypt