Implant Site Preparation With Piezosurgery vs Conventional Drills in Terms of Operation Time, Implant Stability and Bone Density
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Implant Osteotomy
- Interventions
- Procedure: Piezosurgery assisted osteotomyProcedure: Conventional drilling osteotomy
- Registration Number
- NCT05512273
- Lead Sponsor
- Hams Hamed Abdelrahman
- Brief Summary
The preparation of the implant site has a major influence on the success rate and long-term survival of dental implants. Piezoelectric devices and special implant drilling inserts are now emerging to replace conventional drills.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 24
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients with bilateral missing premolars
- Remaining bone height more ≥ 10mm.
- Remaining bone width ≥ 6mm
Exclusion Criteria
- patients that smoke more than 10 cigarettes/day
- Patients with uncontrolled systemic disease.
- Presence of bone pathology within the future osteotomy site
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Study Piezosurgery assisted osteotomy - Control Conventional drilling osteotomy -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time of surgery through operation completion Average surgical times for implant site was estimated
Change in implant stability at baseline and 4 months ISQ was measured using ostell device
Change in bone density at baseline and 4 months Mean bone density using CBCT
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Beirut Arab University
🇱🇧Beirut, Lebanon