Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00910286
NCT00910286
Completed
Not Applicable

VENTILAÇÃO MECÂNICA COM PRESSÃO SUPORTE: ESTUDO DA ASSINCRONIA EXPIRATÓRIA (in Portughese)

Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre1 site in 1 country18 target enrollmentDecember 2004

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Ventilator Weaning
Sponsor
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Enrollment
18
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
comfort
Status
Completed
Last Updated
16 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Objective: To compare termination criteria (TC) of pressure support ventilation (PSV).

Design: Randomized cross-over clinical trial.

Setting: Intensive Care Units.

Patients: Sixteen patients on PSV with ability to answer a visual analog scale (VAS).

Protocol and Measurements: Each patient was ventilated with two different TC ventilators, fixed and automatic, with measurements of ventilatory mechanic variables, breathing comfort and asynchrony patterns.

Detailed Description

Two ventilators with different flow termination criteria (TC) were compared: Servo 300 (Siemens-Elema, Solna, Sweden) with fixed TC (5% of peak inspiratory flow) and Newport E500 (Newport Medical Instruments, Costa Mesa, CA) with automatic TC (varies between 5% to 55%). Each patient remained three hours in the protocol, one hour in each ventilator, after been randomized to one of two sequences of 3 steps: Fixed 5% / Automatic / Fixed 5% or Automatic / Fixed 5% / Automatic (Figure 1). The transition among the ventilators was realized through a three-way flow directional valve (Three-Way T-Shape TM, Hans Rudolph Incorporation, Kansas City, EUA). The PS level was determined by clinical staff to partially unload the respiratory muscle without respiratory distress based on observation of the patient's breathing pattern. The PS, the positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), the inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) and the pressure trigger sensitivity levels were unchanged during the protocol. Study variables: Patients' demographic, anthropometric and clinical data were obtained (Table 1). The study variables were detected noninvasively using only airway pressure (Paw) and flow signals, obtained with a pressure differential pneumotachometer (CO2SMO Plus; Novametrix Medical Systems, Wallingford, CT) located at the distal end of the ventilator circuit . Three records of five minutes were realized in each study step: time = 0' (0-5 min), t = 30' (30-35 min) and t = 55' (55-60 min). Data were digitalized at 100 Hz and recorded on a personal computer for subsequent analysis (LabVIEW 7.1, National Instruments Corporation, Austin, TX). A total of nine record phases of five minutes from each patient were analyzed .The variables values were obtained by one hundred ventilatory cycles from each recorded phase Measured variables: The following variables were analyzed (detailed descriptions of each one were in the Electronic Supplementary Material - ESM): * Ventilatory parameters: PS (PSadjusted); measured PS (PSeffective) and PEEP (PEEPeffective); peak airway pressure; effective flow termination criterion (TC - V'ti/V'peak, %) . * Breathing pattern: tidal volume obtained by mathematical integration of the flow signal; respiratory rate; minute ventilation; inspiratory time; expiratory time; duty cycle (Ti/Ttot); time constant obtained by measuring the slope off the expiratory limb of the flow-volume plot . * Respiratory effort: pressure-time product required to ventilator trigger (PTPtrigger) ; inspiratory delivered assistance pressure-time products at 300 ms (PTPdelivered-assistance300) and 500 ms (PTPdelivered-assistance500) after the onset of inspiratory effort; over assistance pressure-time product (PTPover-assistance) (see Figure 2 for details); airway occlusion pressure at 0.1 second (P0.1) . * Breathing comfort: evaluated by a modified VAS, labeled 0 to 10 (0 = best comfort and 10 = worst comfort) . * Asynchrony patterns: ineffective efforts, both during inspiration and expiration, (IEinspiratory and IEexpiratory), double-triggering (D-T) and autotriggering (A-T) were detected by visual inspection of the flow and airway pressure signals recordings . Statistical Analysis: The statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS 15.0, Chicago, EUA) and the significance level was established as p \< 0.05. Tests are detailed in the ESM.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
December 2004
End Date
June 2008
Last Updated
16 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Crossover
Sex
All

Investigators

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients under PSV for more than 24 hours,
  • Age \> 18 years
  • Ability to answer to a symptom visual analog scale (VAS)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Hemodynamic instability (use of vasoactive drugs like dopamine, dobutamine or norepinephrine)
  • Bronchopleural fistula

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

comfort

Time Frame: 30 minutes

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Terminated
Not Applicable
Efficacy of Volume Ventilation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure at Risk of Obstructive Apneas or Obesity HypoventilationAcute Respiratory FailureHypercapnic Respiratory FailureRespiratory AcidosisObesityHypoventilation SyndromeApnea, Obstructive
NCT04131660University Hospital, Rouen14
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Two Ventilator Mode During the Night: New Strategy of Mechanical Ventilation WeaningWeaning FailureCOPD Exacerbation
NCT01573481Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens19
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison Between Volume Controlled Ventilation and Pressure Controlled VentilationObesityReduced Lung Compliance.Anesthesia.Laparoscopy.
NCT00224653Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris36
Recruiting
Phase 2
COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR WEANING A PATIENT FROM MECHANICAL VENTILATOR.Health Condition 1: G988- Other disorders of nervous systemHealth Condition 2: T449- Poisoning by, adverse effect of and underdosing of other and unspecified drugs primarily affecting the autonomic nervous systemHealth Condition 3: J969- Respiratory failure, unspecifiedHealth Condition 4: I999- Unspecified disorder of circulatory system
CTRI/2020/02/023466Johnson
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparing the effect of pressure support ventilation and volume assured pressure support ventilation in weaning of mechanical ventilation in patients after cardiac surgeryTime of weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients after cardiac surgery.
IRCT2013040512896N1Mashhad Univesity of Medical Sciences35