A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AQUAVAN Injection Versus Midazolam HCl for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy Procedures
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- Eisai Inc.
- 入组人数
- 270
- 主要终点
- The primary efficacy hypothesis was that AQUAVAN could sedate (≥3 consecutive Modified OAA/S scores ≤4) patients AND that they could complete the procedure successfully without requiring alternative sedative medication AND without requiring manual or
研究概览
简要总结
This study was designed to demonstrate that AQUAVAN® is effective in providing adequate sedation in patients undergoing colonoscopy as well as to assess the safety profile of AQUAVAN versus that of midazolam. Prior to the procedure, patients received fentanyl citrate for pain management followed five minutes later by AQUAVAN® Injection for sedation. Throughout the procedure, study personnel assessed the patient's vital signs and depth of sedation. After the procedure, the patient, physician, and an evaluator were asked to complete satisfaction surveys.
详细描述
This is a randomized, open-label study designed to assess the safety and efficacy of AQUAVAN® Injection versus midazolam HCl following pretreatment with an analgesic, fentanyl citrate injection, in producing sedation in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Randomization will be stratified by site. Following completion of pre-procedure sedation assessments, patients will be randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 i.v. treatment groups at a 3:1 (AQUAVAN® Injection: midazolam HCl) allocation ratio. All study patients, irrespective of treatment group assignment, will receive fentanyl citrate injection as an analgesic pretreatment. Supplemental doses of fentanyl citrate injection may be administered if the patient reports pain or if inadequate analgesia is present as demonstrated by increased heart rate and/or blood pressure in the presence of adequate sedation. At no time should fentanyl citrate injection be administered to increase sedation levels. AQUAVAN® Injection and midazolam HCl will be administered to induce a state of adequate sedation, defined as a Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness / Sedation (OAA/S) score of 4 or less. Supplemental doses will be administered to increase depth or duration of sedation. Supplemental doses will not be administered if the Modified OAA/S score is 2 or less or if there is no purposeful response to stimulation. The depth of sedation will be measured by the Modified OAA/S scale, a validated measure. Patient and Investigator assessments will be used to confirm the depth of sedation provided met the goals of sedation, reduction of anxiet, and reduced awareness.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 65 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patient provided a signed/dated Informed Consent and HIPAA authorization after receiving a full explanation of the extent and nature of the study;
- •Patient, if female, were surgically sterile, postmenopausal or non-pregnant and non lactating using an acceptable method of birth control for at least 1 month prior to dosing, with a negative urine pregnancy test result at screening and predose periods; and
- •Patient met American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System of I to III.
排除标准
- •Patient had a history of allergic reaction or hypersensitivity to any anesthetic agent, narcotic, or benzodiazepine;
- •Patient did not meet nils per os (NPO) status per ASA Guideline or institution's guideline.
- •Patient had condition(s) that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could interfere with appropriate airway management;
- •Patient participated in an investigational drug study within 1 month prior to study start;
- •Patient had a history of mental or visual impairment that would not permit successful measurement of cognitive evaluations;
- •Patient was unwilling to adhere to pre- and postprocedural instructions; or
- •Patient for whom the use of fentanyl or midazolam was contraindicated.
结局指标
主要结局
The primary efficacy hypothesis was that AQUAVAN could sedate (≥3 consecutive Modified OAA/S scores ≤4) patients AND that they could complete the procedure successfully without requiring alternative sedative medication AND without requiring manual or
次要结局
- Laboratory parameters and vital signs
- Secondary Efficacy Endpoints
- Duration of sedation
- Time to Fully Recovered from end of procedure
- Change from baseline DSST score over time during recovery period
- Number of procedure interruptions due to inadequate sedation
- Safety Endpoints
- Time to Fully Alert from end of procedure
- Duration and percent of time when a patient's Modified OAA/S score is at each level between the first dose of study medications and Fully Alert, inclusive
- Time to sedation
- Patient's rating of experience after Fully Recovered
- Investigator's rating at end of procedure
- Sedation-related adverse events
- Number of doses of study medication administered for the procedure
- Number of repositionings
- Patient's rating at 24 hour post discharge telephone survey
- Blinded evaluator's rating after patient is Fully Recovered
- Nature, frequency, severity, relationship to treatment, and outcome of all adverse events
- Concomitant medications
- Time to reach splenic flexure, hepatic flexure, cecum, and end of procedure
- Airway assistance