跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03465371
NCT03465371已完成不适用

CSC OnDemand: An Innovative Online Learning Platform for Implementing Coordinated Specialty Care

Center for Social Innovation, Massachusetts2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 349 人开始时间: 2018年10月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
349
试验地点
2
主要终点
Provider-level: Success in increasing CSC providers shared decision making

研究概览

简要总结

In response to the growing need for training on interventions to address first episode psychosis, the Center for Social Innovation (C4) partnered with experts in Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) to develop and test CSC OnDemand: An Innovative Online Learning Platform for Implementing Coordinated Specialty Care. The product builds on the findings of the Recovery After an Initial Schizophrenia Episode (RAISE) studies, funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). RAISE examined team-based models of care for people early in the course of schizophrenia. Through a Fast Track Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grant, investigators will prototype, test, refine, and evaluate the impact of CSC OnDemand.

详细描述

Building on existing resources and the expertise of our faculty and advisors, the investigators developed CSC OnDemand, a multifaceted online learning product that includes four levels: 1) an online readiness tool and CSC Learning Hub; 2) dynamic multimedia core curriculum on first episode psychosis and CSC; 3) live faculty-led online courses; and 4) ongoing support, including an online community of practice to support peer-to-peer learning.

During Phases I and II of this Fast Track SBIR, the investigators prototyped, pilot tested, built out, and evaluated the product through a cluster randomized study comparing it with InPerson training (and due to the global pandemic, a "virtual" in person training, using Zoom to train with the same curriculum as in-person, creating (unexpectedly) three study arms).

Phase I built a robust prototype of the online platform and tested it with 16 providers from three sites. This phase explored feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of the product, and examined which components of the online platform providers found most useful.

Based on our findings from Phase I, the investigators refined and fully built out the product to test in a larger randomized trial. Phase II used a cluster randomized non-inferiority design to assess if OnDemand training (n = 20 sites) was comparable to InPerson training (n = 10 sites). Using a mixed-methods approach, the investigators examined provider (n enrolled was 239; after attrition 206) outcomes (satisfaction; knowledge gains/retention; attitudes toward shared decision making) and client (n = 110) outcomes (work/school participation; engagement in CSC services; inpatient psychiatric hospitalizations).

The study was guided by the following specific aims:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Agencies will need to provide:
  • direct care to individuals with early psychosis;
  • administrative-level support for training and use of the CSC model;
  • an entire treatment team that is willing to participate in this team-based intervention;
  • contact information for direct service staff;
  • support for the study, including a staff person to serve as a liaison to work with the research team;
  • access to the Internet during the intervention period; and
  • a willingness to provide data and participate in the evaluation.

排除标准

  • Teams should not have previously received CSC training.

结局指标

主要结局

Provider-level: Success in increasing CSC providers shared decision making

时间窗: Up to 9 months

Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-physician version (SDM-Q-Doc) is a standardized brief instrument (9 items) for assessing SDM in clinical encounters. SDM-Q-Doc was developed for physicians, but has been adapted to all healthcare professionals. The instrument consists of 9 statements rated on a 6-point scale from "completely disagree" (0) to "completely agree" (5). The items are summed to create a total score.

Provider-level: Success in increasing CSC providers knowledge of CSC

时间窗: Up to 9 months

CSC knowledge will be assessed with a 50-item, complex, multiple-choice test (25 common across disciplines, 25 discipline-specific), which will be created in conjunction with the intervention modules and will be piloted in Phase I. The outcome will be the percentage of correct responses.

次要结局

  • Client-level: Engagement(Up to 9 months)
  • Client-level: Work/School Participation(Up to 9 months)
  • Client-level: Psychiatric Hospitalization(Up to 9 months)

研究者

发起方
Center for Social Innovation, Massachusetts
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

CSC OnDemand: An Innovative Online Learning Platform... | 临床试验