跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04277585
NCT04277585已完成不适用

Improving Access to Early Psychosis Coordinated Specialty Care Services

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 2 人开始时间: 2019年9月27日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
2
试验地点
2
主要终点
Mean Telehealth Healthcare Service Satisfaction and Usability Score (Month 3)

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of developing an Early Psychosis CSC service delivery model suitable for rural settings in NC. Major challenges to delivery of specialized health care services for persons in the early stages of psychosis include the high level of provider expertise and the frequency and intensity of services. These challenges limit the feasibility of brick-and-mortar programs to serve individuals living in rural settings. This study proposes to expand service delivery methods to include telehealth as a potential solution.

详细描述

The UNC OASIS program currently provides evidenced-based outpatient coordinated specialty care services (CSC) to persons within the first five years of a psychotic disorder. Medical management and psychotherapy services are mainly provided in brick and mortar offices. Supported education, supported employment, and peer support services are provided in offices and also in the community. The service model is relatively intense, involving treatment sessions up to several times a week. Thus a barrier to persons in rural North Carolina receiving CSC services is the time taken to travel to office based appointments.

The purpose of this study is to determine feasibility and acceptability of providing some of the services provided by OASIS via telehealth.

Participants: Up to 10 patients who have been accepted by the OASIS program and who live 45-minutes or more from the UNC OASIS program or another CSC program. Participants must also have home internet bandwidth sufficient to support the telehealth platform and own a computer or other device (smart phone, tablet, etc.) compatible with the telehealth platform.

Procedures (methods): The OASIS program does not exclude patients based on where they live in North Carolina. Potential OASIS patients and their families participate in an initial psychosocial and medical evaluation. At this time the OASIS program director reviews the OASIS program expectations with the patient and family. If the OASIS program and the patient and the patient's family member agree that the OASIS program is a good fit, the patient is then accepted into the program. After acceptance into the OASIS program patients who live 45 minutes or more away from the UNC OASIS or another CSC program and who reside in North Carolina will be informed about the availability of the telehealth pilot project by the OASIS program director.

UNCH has developed a telehealth service that is provided via the UNC electronic medical record platform, EPIC. If interested, the OASIS patient and their family member will meet with a study staff person, who will evaluate whether their internet bandwidth is sufficient to support the EPIC telehealth platform and if they own a computer or other device that supports the EPIC telehealth platform. Patients who are interested and who meet these requirements will then participate in the oral and written informed consent process.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

盲法说明

open label

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 36 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age 18-36
  • Reside in NC
  • Live more than a 45 minute drive from UNC OASIS or UNC Encompass CSC programs.
  • Accepted into the OASIS program.
  • Have access to a computer or other device with broadband internet sufficient to support the EPIC-delivered telehealth services.
  • Willing to receive some services via telehealth. A family member of a patient who is participating in this research study.

排除标准

  • Not age 18-36
  • Does not reside in NC
  • Live within a 45 minute drive from UNC OASIS or UNC Encompass CSC programs.
  • Not accepted into the OASIS program.
  • No access to a computer or other device with broadband internet sufficient to support the EPIC-delivered telehealth services.
  • Not willing to receive any services via telehealth

结局指标

主要结局

Mean Telehealth Healthcare Service Satisfaction and Usability Score (Month 3)

时间窗: 3 months

The UNC OASIS Telehealth Satisfaction and Usability Survey is a self-report measure with 8 items assessing satisfaction with aspects of telehealth service delivery. Items using 5-item likert scale ranged from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree. Items include: 1) sessions ran smoothly, 2) preference for in-person or telehealth service or no preference, 3) comfortable using telehealth technology, 4) technical difficulties encountered (5-item likert ranging from Never to Often), 5) privacy/confidentiality of telehealth as either better than/same as/not as good as in-person visits and any comments, 6) comfort level communicating to staff using telehealth, 7) whether telehealth made attending appointments easier/same as/more difficult than in person visits, 8) whether would use telehealth services again. Lower scores reflect higher satisfaction.

Mean Telehealth Healthcare Service Satisfaction and Usability Score (Month 6)

时间窗: 6 months

The UNC OASIS Telehealth Satisfaction and Usability Survey is a self-report measure with 8 items assessing satisfaction with aspects of telehealth service delivery. Items using 5-item likert scale ranged from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree. Items include: 1) sessions ran smoothly, 2) preference for in-person or telehealth service or no preference, 3) comfortable using telehealth technology, 4) technical difficulties encountered (5-item likert ranging from Never to Often), 5) privacy/confidentiality of telehealth as either better than/same as/not as good as in-person visits and any comments, 6) comfort level communicating to staff using telehealth, 7) whether telehealth made attending appointments easier/same as/more difficult than in person visits, 8) whether would use telehealth services again. Lower scores reflect higher satisfaction.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验