MedPath

RCT Comparing Invisalign and Traditional Orthodontic Treatment

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Malocclusion, Angle Class II
Registration Number
NCT04556448
Lead Sponsor
Texas A&M University
Brief Summary

Comparison of orthodontic patients treated with aligners and traditional (clear braces)

Detailed Description

Patients were selected based on being adults and having mild Class I malocclusion. They were randomly allocated into either the aligner group and the traditiona (clear braces group).. The aligner group was treated with invisalign, with up to two adjustments at the end of treatment. The traditional group had clear braces placed on their teeth. The outcome variables including the following: 1) pain and discomfort related to treatment, 2) posttreatment occlusal status, and 3) postretention occlusal status.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
78
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Class I molar and canine relationships
  2. Non-extraction treatments
  3. Mandibular crowding of 4 mm or less
  4. No missing tooth (from second to second molar)
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Anterior or posterior crossbites
  2. Anterior or lateral open bites
  3. Maxillary overjet exceeding 3mm
  4. Impacted tooth

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Occlusal changesup to 6 months

Differences in occlusion between the two groups

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Texas A&M Baylor College of Dentisry

🇺🇸

Dallas, Texas, United States

Texas A&M Baylor College of Dentisry
🇺🇸Dallas, Texas, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.