MedPath

3D Evaluation of Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Orthodontic Treatment of Lower Anterior Crowding

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Pathological Resorption of External Root
Interventions
Device: oramco bracket
Device: U lab aligners
Registration Number
NCT06510569
Lead Sponsor
Haidy Fekry
Brief Summary

Evaluate and compare clear aligners versus fixed orthodontic treatment of lower anterior crowding with the use of cone-beam computed tomography within maximum 6 months or until correction of lower anterior crowding whichever is nearest to occur.

Detailed Description

Group (A): Patients will be treated with conventional fixed orthodontic treatment in lower anterior crowding.

Group (B): Patients will be treated with clear aligner therapy in lower anterior crowding.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria

Adult female patients . age 18-25 y . Patients with mild to moderate lower anterior crowding (1 mm - 6 mm ) . Healthy compliant and motivated patient . full dentition except wisdom teeth .

Exclusion Criteria

Previous orthodontic treatments. Any systemic disease Pregnant and lactating female. pocket depth more than 5 mm.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Fixed orthodontic treatmentoramco bracketOromo bracket
Clear aligner therapyU lab alignersU lab aligners
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Correction of lower anterior crowding6 months

according to little irregularity index

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Al Azhar Universty

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

Haidy Fekry

🇪🇬

Zagazig, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath