3D Evaluation of Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Orthodontic Treatment of Lower Anterior Crowding
- Conditions
- Pathological Resorption of External Root
- Interventions
- Device: oramco bracketDevice: U lab aligners
- Registration Number
- NCT06510569
- Lead Sponsor
- Haidy Fekry
- Brief Summary
Evaluate and compare clear aligners versus fixed orthodontic treatment of lower anterior crowding with the use of cone-beam computed tomography within maximum 6 months or until correction of lower anterior crowding whichever is nearest to occur.
- Detailed Description
Group (A): Patients will be treated with conventional fixed orthodontic treatment in lower anterior crowding.
Group (B): Patients will be treated with clear aligner therapy in lower anterior crowding.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 20
Adult female patients . age 18-25 y . Patients with mild to moderate lower anterior crowding (1 mm - 6 mm ) . Healthy compliant and motivated patient . full dentition except wisdom teeth .
Previous orthodontic treatments. Any systemic disease Pregnant and lactating female. pocket depth more than 5 mm.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Fixed orthodontic treatment oramco bracket Oromo bracket Clear aligner therapy U lab aligners U lab aligners
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Correction of lower anterior crowding 6 months according to little irregularity index
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Al Azhar Universty
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt
Haidy Fekry
🇪🇬Zagazig, Egypt