Non-invasive Ventilation Versus High Flow Oxygen
- Conditions
- Pneumonia-associated Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
- Interventions
- Device: High Flow Oxygen nasal cannulaDevice: Noninvasive ventilation
- Registration Number
- NCT03758508
- Lead Sponsor
- Niguarda Hospital
- Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of alternating Non Invasive Ventilation NIV and High Flow Oxygen HFO compared to High Flow Oxygen HFO alone on gas exchanges and prognosis in pneumonia-associated acute hypoxemic respiratory failure
- Detailed Description
Both Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) and High Flow Oxygen through nasal cannula (HFO) are widely used in the setting of hypoxemic respiratory failure of heterogeneous etiology, with no definitive evidence for the superiority of one technique on the other. The purpose of this study is to determine whether alternating NIV and HFO brings any advantage on gas exchanges and prognosis compared to the use of HFO alone in the homogeneous setting of pneumonia-associated acute hypoxemic respiratory failure
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 128
-
Diagnosis of pneumonia based on at least two clinical/laboratory criteria and 1 radiologic criterion among the following:
- Clinical criteria: fever, cough, purulent sputum, pulmonary examination positive for signs consistent with pneumonia
- Laboratory criteria: leukocytosis (White blood cells >10000/mcL) or leukopenia (White blood cells < 4000/mcL), rise of the inflammatory markers
- Radiologic criteria: consolidations at Chest X-ray or CT scan
-
Hypoxemic respiratory failure, based on all the following criteria
- PaO2/FiO2 < 300 after at least 15 minutes conventional oxygen therapy with a FiO2 ≥ 50%
- Respiratory Rate (RR) ≥ 25/min or need for use of accessory muscles
-
Informed consent to study participation
- Age < 18 years
- Hypercapnic respiratory failure (pCO2 > 60 mmHg at presentation) such as in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Presence of another cause of hypoxemic respiratory failure - e.g. pulmonary embolism, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pulmonary oedema
- Hemodynamic instability with necessity for use of inotropes and/or vasopressors
- Indication for endotracheal intubation (ETI): Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) <8, agitation, device intolerance, respiratory arrest
- Immunosuppression (chronic immunosuppressive therapy, clinical history positive for any immunodeficiency - congenital or acquired)
- Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) and Do Not Intubate (DNI) indication
- Tracheostomy
- Nocturnal CPAP ventilation therapy
- Any other condition which the clinician would considered an adjunctive risk for taking part in the study or that would not permit the participant to complete it
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description NIV/HFO Noninvasive ventilation Alternating noninvasive ventilation (3 hours) and high flow oxygen through nasal cannula (3 hours) for 45 hours; longer if the clinical need persists HFO High Flow Oxygen nasal cannula Continuous high flow oxygen through nasal cannula for 45 hours; longer if the clinical need persists NIV/HFO High Flow Oxygen nasal cannula Alternating noninvasive ventilation (3 hours) and high flow oxygen through nasal cannula (3 hours) for 45 hours; longer if the clinical need persists
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method PaO2/FiO2 improvement at baseline and at 21 hours Efficacy of alternating NIV and HFO compared to HFO alone in the determination of an improvement of PaO2/FiO2 at 21 hours compared to baseline PaO2/FiO2
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method New hospital admission 30 days Rate of a new hospital admission within 30 days
PaO2/FiO2 improvement at baseline and at 30 days Efficacy of alternating NIV and HFO compared to HFO alone in the determination of a change in PaO2/FiO2 at 30 hours compared to baseline PaO2/FiO2
Intensive Care admission 30 days Rate of admission to Intensive Care Unit in the two arms
Sensation of device comfort and dyspnoea Baseline, at 21 hours, 45 hours and 30 days after beginning treatment. Optional measures can be taken at 1, 3 and 9 hours Evaluation of subjective sensation of device comfort and dyspnoea in the two arms
Time to downgrade to conventional oxygen therapy 30 days Total amount of hours in which the patient needs to be treated with noninvasive ventilation alternate to versus high flow oxygen through nasal cannula
In-hospital mortality 30 days Mortality rate in the 2 arms
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
🇮🇹Milano, Italy