MedPath

Non-invasive Ventilation Versus High Flow Oxygen

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Pneumonia-associated Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Interventions
Device: High Flow Oxygen nasal cannula
Device: Noninvasive ventilation
Registration Number
NCT03758508
Lead Sponsor
Niguarda Hospital
Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of alternating Non Invasive Ventilation NIV and High Flow Oxygen HFO compared to High Flow Oxygen HFO alone on gas exchanges and prognosis in pneumonia-associated acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

Detailed Description

Both Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) and High Flow Oxygen through nasal cannula (HFO) are widely used in the setting of hypoxemic respiratory failure of heterogeneous etiology, with no definitive evidence for the superiority of one technique on the other. The purpose of this study is to determine whether alternating NIV and HFO brings any advantage on gas exchanges and prognosis compared to the use of HFO alone in the homogeneous setting of pneumonia-associated acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
128
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosis of pneumonia based on at least two clinical/laboratory criteria and 1 radiologic criterion among the following:

    • Clinical criteria: fever, cough, purulent sputum, pulmonary examination positive for signs consistent with pneumonia
    • Laboratory criteria: leukocytosis (White blood cells >10000/mcL) or leukopenia (White blood cells < 4000/mcL), rise of the inflammatory markers
    • Radiologic criteria: consolidations at Chest X-ray or CT scan
  • Hypoxemic respiratory failure, based on all the following criteria

    • PaO2/FiO2 < 300 after at least 15 minutes conventional oxygen therapy with a FiO2 ≥ 50%
    • Respiratory Rate (RR) ≥ 25/min or need for use of accessory muscles
  • Informed consent to study participation

Exclusion Criteria
  • Age < 18 years
  • Hypercapnic respiratory failure (pCO2 > 60 mmHg at presentation) such as in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
  • Presence of another cause of hypoxemic respiratory failure - e.g. pulmonary embolism, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pulmonary oedema
  • Hemodynamic instability with necessity for use of inotropes and/or vasopressors
  • Indication for endotracheal intubation (ETI): Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) <8, agitation, device intolerance, respiratory arrest
  • Immunosuppression (chronic immunosuppressive therapy, clinical history positive for any immunodeficiency - congenital or acquired)
  • Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) and Do Not Intubate (DNI) indication
  • Tracheostomy
  • Nocturnal CPAP ventilation therapy
  • Any other condition which the clinician would considered an adjunctive risk for taking part in the study or that would not permit the participant to complete it

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
NIV/HFONoninvasive ventilationAlternating noninvasive ventilation (3 hours) and high flow oxygen through nasal cannula (3 hours) for 45 hours; longer if the clinical need persists
HFOHigh Flow Oxygen nasal cannulaContinuous high flow oxygen through nasal cannula for 45 hours; longer if the clinical need persists
NIV/HFOHigh Flow Oxygen nasal cannulaAlternating noninvasive ventilation (3 hours) and high flow oxygen through nasal cannula (3 hours) for 45 hours; longer if the clinical need persists
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
PaO2/FiO2 improvementat baseline and at 21 hours

Efficacy of alternating NIV and HFO compared to HFO alone in the determination of an improvement of PaO2/FiO2 at 21 hours compared to baseline PaO2/FiO2

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
New hospital admission30 days

Rate of a new hospital admission within 30 days

PaO2/FiO2 improvementat baseline and at 30 days

Efficacy of alternating NIV and HFO compared to HFO alone in the determination of a change in PaO2/FiO2 at 30 hours compared to baseline PaO2/FiO2

Intensive Care admission30 days

Rate of admission to Intensive Care Unit in the two arms

Sensation of device comfort and dyspnoeaBaseline, at 21 hours, 45 hours and 30 days after beginning treatment. Optional measures can be taken at 1, 3 and 9 hours

Evaluation of subjective sensation of device comfort and dyspnoea in the two arms

Time to downgrade to conventional oxygen therapy30 days

Total amount of hours in which the patient needs to be treated with noninvasive ventilation alternate to versus high flow oxygen through nasal cannula

In-hospital mortality30 days

Mortality rate in the 2 arms

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda

🇮🇹

Milano, Italy

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath