MedPath

The Development of a Domestic Violence Perpetrator Collusion Measurement Tool

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Intimate Partner Violence (IPV)
Registration Number
NCT01942616
Lead Sponsor
Yale University
Brief Summary

We propose an experimental design to empirically establish the potential link between the media portrayal of DV and changes in an individual's DV descriptive and injunctive social norms. Specifically, this study will measure the degree to which people implicitly collude with DV perpetration.

Detailed Description

Aim 1: To determine the impact of media "frames," "labeling," and "information inclusion" on "implicit collusion" with a DV perpetrator.

Hypotheses: Consumers exposed to media reports using "thematic frames" will be less likely to implicitly collude with perpetrators than those exposed to "episodic frames." Consumers exposed to DVH news stories labeled as "domestic violence" will be less likely to implicitly collude with perpetrators than consumers exposed to news stories labeled as "assault." Implicit collusion will correlate positively with the addition of non-relevant perpetrator "humanizing" characteristics. Consumers given negative information about the victim of DVH will be more likely to implicitly collude with the perpetrator than consumers given negative information about the perpetrator.

Aim 2: To determine how media portrayals of domestic violence impact descriptive and injunctive norms about domestic violence and, ultimately, drive implicit collusion with perpetrators.

Hypotheses: Controlling for individual pre-existing attitudes and social norms, consumers exposed to thematic frames or the label of DV will be less likely to shift their norms in a way that supports DV than those exposed to episodic frames or the label of assault. Consumers provided negative victim information or non-relevant characteristics that humanize the perpetrator will be more likely to shift their norms to accept DV.

Exploratory Aim: To identify racial/ethnic, gender, age, and regional differences in DV social norms.

Hypothesis: The media will differentially impact subpopulation DV attitudes, social norms and implicit collusion.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
72
Inclusion Criteria
  • Members of the public who are 18 years or older, who identify as White or African American or Hispanic.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Members of the public will be excluded if they are unable to read or understand English.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from Baseline on The Collusion Framing SubscaleThe scale is administered at baseline and then following the sub experiment for a total of 2 times, 30 minutes apart.

The scale will be developed based on the changes from baseline.

Change from Baseline on The Collusion Labeling SubscaleThe scale is administered at baseline and then following the sub experiment for a total of 2 times, 30 minutes apart.

The scale will be developed based on the changes from baseline.

Change from Baseline on The Collusion Extraneous Information SubscaleThe scale is administered at baseline and then following the sub experiment for a total of 2 times, 30 minutes apart.

The scale will be developed based on the changes from baseline.

Change from Baseline on The Collusion Negative Characteristics SubscaleThe scale is administered at baseline and then following the sub experiment for a total of 2 times, 30 minutes apart.

The scale will be developed based on the changes from baseline.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (4)

Michigan State University

🇺🇸

East Lansing, Michigan, United States

Yale University

🇺🇸

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Loyola University New Orleans

🇺🇸

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Michigan Department of Community Health

🇺🇸

Lansing, Michigan, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath