Comparing Skin Conductance and Nol-index
- Conditions
- MonitoringAnalgesiaAnesthesiaVascular DiseasesCardiac Disease
- Interventions
- Device: Nol-IndexDevice: Skin Conductance
- Registration Number
- NCT04138966
- Lead Sponsor
- Erasme University Hospital
- Brief Summary
Comparison of twà different nociception monitors during general anesthesia
- Detailed Description
Analgesia remains a challenge in anesthesia. Several monitors have shown potential in detecting insufficient analgesia during general anesthesia, but they have not been investigated in patients undergoing cardiac and vascular surgery. In this study, we will compare skin conductance (Medstorm, Norway) and nol-index (Medasense, Israel) w during noxious and non-noxious stimuli. This study is carried out on patients included in another study (Nol-Index Guided Remifentanil Analgesia Versus Standard Analgesia During Moderate-to-High Risk Cardiovascular Surgery).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 10
- moderate-to-high risk cardiac or vascular surgery
- ASA 2-4
- chronic arrhythmia (e.g. atrial fibrillation)
- aortic insufficiency
- pacemaker
- implanted defibrillator
- valve surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Patients undergoing general anesthesia Skin Conductance Patients are monitored with Nol-Index, skin conductance, and antinociception-index Patients undergoing general anesthesia Nol-Index Patients are monitored with Nol-Index, skin conductance, and antinociception-index
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Nol-Index response 1 to 2 hours Nol-Index (diminsenliss value from 0 to 100) will be assessed during noxious and non noxious stimuli
Skin conductance response 1 to 2 hours Peaks per second change during noxious and non noxious stimuli
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Anesthesia Department, Erasme Hospital
🇧🇪Brussels, Belgium