跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00572702
NCT00572702Unknown不适用

Open, Randomized, Prospective, Comparative, Multicentric to Treat Prolapse of Vaginal Cuff After Hysterectomy With Amreich Procedure or Total Prolift Procedure

Charles University, Czech Republic10 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2007年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
200
试验地点
10
主要终点
The objective evaluation o perioperative complications and comparison of patients with pelvic organ prolapse treated with Amreich-Richter procedure or Prolift implants.

研究概览

简要总结

Head to Head comparison of perioperative complications and secondary the impact of operation techniques with or without mesh on patients suffering from pelvic organ prolapse on quality of life.

详细描述

During the last decade a substantial progress in the detailed knowledge of morphology and function of different compartments of the female pelvic floor was achieved. The obtained informations were quickly implemented in the clinical practice especially in the application of special meshes and of novel techniques of their implantation. Their success rate was evaluated only in pilot companies supported studies. We do miss randomised studies not sponsored by company comparing different surgical techniques and their impact on the quality of life (QoL); the objective estimation of those consequences is for the longlasting effect of the surgery inevitable. The new methods bring also new complications which were not yet relevantly and objectively documented.

In the study we compare the techniques contemporary used - in the groups with or without mesh, in size relevant for the statistical evaluation

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • female sex
  • age 18 and more
  • subscribed informed consent
  • objective symptoms of prolapse-POP-Q 3 and more according to ICS standards
  • compliance of the patient

排除标准

  • patients with evidence of malignant lesion in small pelvis
  • history of radiotherapy in small pelvis
  • patients suffering from any form of PID within inclusion process
  • pregnancy
  • lactation
  • total eversion of uterus and vagina
  • serious internal disorders
  • history of recto- or vesico-vaginal fistula
  • history of rejection of any artificial material
  • symptoms of primary genuine stress urinary incontinence
  • patients who were not able to subscribe the informed consent
  • patients, who couldn´t be reached for further follow-up

结局指标

主要结局

The objective evaluation o perioperative complications and comparison of patients with pelvic organ prolapse treated with Amreich-Richter procedure or Prolift implants.

时间窗: 3 month

次要结局

  • Ultrasound, urodynamics, clinical examinations, magnetic resonance imaging, validated QoL questionnaires(1 year)

研究者

发起方
Charles University, Czech Republic
申办方类型
Other

研究点 (10)

Loading locations...

相似试验