跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02751333
NCT02751333撤回2 期

Esophageal Stent Migration With Endoscopic Suture Fixation Compared to Standard Deployment in the Management of Benign Esophageal Pathology: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Johns Hopkins University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家开始时间: 2016年3月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
2 期
状态
撤回
试验地点
2
主要终点
Number of participants with Stent Migration as assessed by Symptoms suggestive of stent migration or objective evidence of migration on radiological imaging or endoscopy.

研究概览

简要总结

Esophageal stents are commonly used for benign esophageal pathology, especially strictures or esophageal mucosal defects such as leaks, fistulae, or perforations. The major limiting factor to stent placement is the high migration rate of the stent. Investigators are trying to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of endostitch in preventing stent migration in benign esophageal disease in comparison with standard, fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) placement without fixation.

详细描述

The use of removable, fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) in the management of benign esophageal pathology has been increasingly applied in recent years. Several studies have shown promising results with its application in esophageal perforation, fistula, or leak, and refractory benign strictures. However, the major limiting factor to successful treatment with FCSEMS in this setting is the substantial migration rates.

Different strategies has been used to secure esophageal stents but to little success. Several tertiary institutions including investigators have adopted the use of endostitch (ES) with the OverStitchTM system (Apollo Endosurgery, Austin, Texas) as the preferred method for stent fixation. Animal ex-vivo studies have confirmed the greater anchoring ability and tensile strength with this method when compared to esophageal stenting alone or with through the endoscope clip fixation while retrospective series have shown promising results with lower rates of stent migration when compared to conventional stent insertion. However, although the use of endostitch stent fixation has been used in several centers in the United-States with strong retrospective data (including investigators data), no prospective randomized controlled trial have confirmed its effectiveness in preventing stent migration.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 100 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Adult patients age 18 years and older
  • Patients with esophageal refractory benign strictures (peptic, anastomotic, caustic, radiation, and idiopathic) where a 14 mm luminal diameter cannot be achieved over 2 dilation sessions at 1-3-week intervals.
  • Patients with esophageal leak, perforation, or fistula referred for endoscopic stenting
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document

排除标准

  • Pediatric patients age under 18 years
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
  • Patients with malignant esophageal lesions, primary or metastatic, requiring endoscopic stenting (all females of child bearing age will undergo urine pregnancy testing as per standard1 preprocedural testing)
  • Benign strictures not having had two attempts at endoscopic dilation
  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy defined by partial thromboplastin time (PTT) greater than 50 sec, or international normalized ratio (INR) greater than 1.5
  • Uncorrectable thrombocytopenia with platelet count less than 50, 000

结局指标

主要结局

Number of participants with Stent Migration as assessed by Symptoms suggestive of stent migration or objective evidence of migration on radiological imaging or endoscopy.

时间窗: Up to 6 months

Subjects returning to the hospital following stent placement with symptoms suggestive of stent migration such as fever, abdominal or chest pain, nausea/vomiting, and dysphagia with objective evidence of stent migration either on radiological imaging or endoscopy.

次要结局

  • Clinical success of stent deployment as assessed by the relief of the pre-stent dysphagia(4 weeks, 6 months post-stent removal)
  • Procedure time(During procedure)
  • Stent insertion complication rate(3 days post-stent insertion, 4 weeks post-stent removal)
  • Quality of life(prior to stent insertion and 6 months post-stent removal)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mouen Khashab

Associate professor

Johns Hopkins University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验