MedPath

Mobile Contingency Management for Smoking Cessation

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Smoking Cessation
Interventions
Other: Standard Care (SC)
Behavioral: Automated Mobile Contingency Management (CM)
Registration Number
NCT04881630
Lead Sponsor
University of Oklahoma
Brief Summary

The purpose of the proposed project is to evaluate an automated mobile phone-based CM approach that will allow socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals to remotely benefit from financial incentives for smoking cessation. The investigators have previously combined technologies including 1) portable carbon monoxide monitors that connect with mobile phones to remotely verify smoking abstinence, 2) facial recognition software to confirm participant identity during breath sample submissions, and 3) remote delivery of incentives automatically triggered by biochemical confirmation of self-reported abstinence. This automated CM approach will be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial that includes 532 socioeconomically disadvantaged males and females seeking smoking cessation treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned to either telephone counseling and nicotine replacement therapy (standard care \[SC\]) or SC plus a mobile financial incentives intervention (CM) for biochemically-confirmed abstinence. Participants will be followed for 26 weeks after a scheduled quit attempt. Biochemically-verified 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 26 weeks post-quit will be the primary outcome variable. Cost-effectiveness will be evaluated to inform policy-related decisions. Potential mobile CM treatment mechanisms, including self-efficacy, motivation, and treatment engagement, will be explored to optimize future versions of the intervention.

Detailed Description

The primary purpose of the proposed project is to evaluate an automated smartphone-based CM approach that will allow socioeconomically disadvantaged adults to earn financial incentives for smoking cessation without requiring in-person attendance for abstinence verification. The investigators have combined technologies: 1) low-cost carbon monoxide monitors that connect with mobile phones to remotely verify smoking abstinence, 2) facial recognition software to verify the identity of participants while they provide a breath sample, and 3) remote and automated delivery of incentives to a credit card triggered by biochemical confirmation of self-reported smoking abstinence. This CM approach will be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial of 532 socioeconomically disadvantaged males and females seeking smoking cessation treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned to telephone counseling plus nicotine replacement therapy (standard care \[SC\]) or SC plus a 12-week smartphone-based financial incentives intervention (CM). Participants will be followed for 26 weeks after a scheduled quit attempt, which is 14 weeks after incentives have ended. Cost-effectiveness will be evaluated to inform policy and health care decisions. Potential CM treatment mechanisms, including self-efficacy, motivation, and treatment engagement will be identified to optimize future versions of the intervention. The specific aims are: 1) to evaluate the impact of an automated, mobile phone-based CM approach relative to SC on smoking cessation among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults, 2) to compare the cost-effectiveness of two smoking cessation interventions (CM vs. SC), and 3) to identify mobile CM treatment mechanisms such as motivation to quit, self-efficacy for quitting, and treatment engagement/adherence. The proposed study will evaluate an intervention approach that increases the reach of a potentially effective and cost-effective smoking cessation intervention for socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers. This proposed study is also going to be conducting recruitment nationwide.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
532
Inclusion Criteria
  1. report an annual household income of <200% of the federal poverty threshold (i.e., low-income)
  2. earn a score ≥4 on the REALM indicating >6th grade English literacy level (i.e., a 7th grade reading level is necessary to complete assessments)
  3. are willing to quit smoking 7-14 days after enrollment
  4. are ≥ 18 years of age
  5. currently smoke ≥ 5 cigarettes per day
  6. have a CO level of >6 ppm
  7. are willing to abstain from smoking cannabis and other combustible tobacco products (they raise CO levels and mask cigarette abstinence)
  8. have no contraindications for NRT
  9. Provide a copy/photo of driver's license or other documentation as proof of identity and U.S. residence

Exclusion Criteria

  1. do not meet the specified inclusion criteria
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Standard Care (SC)Standard Care (SC)Participants randomized to Standard Care will be offered weekly smoking cessation counseling and pharmacotherapy.
Contingency Management (CM)Automated Mobile Contingency Management (CM)CM participants will receive standard care in addition to small financial incentives for biochemically-verified abstinence.
Contingency Management (CM)Standard Care (SC)CM participants will receive standard care in addition to small financial incentives for biochemically-verified abstinence.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Carbon monoxide-verified smoking abstinence26 weeks post-quit-date

The primary outcome measure is carbon monoxide-verified 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 26 weeks post-quit.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Carbon monoxide-verified smoking abstinence26 weeks post-quit-date

Carbon monoxide-verified 30-day point prevalence abstinence at 26 weeks post-quit-date.

Cost-effectiveness26 weeks post-quit-date

The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) calculated as the difference in mean costs between the new (CM) and standard treatment (SC) divided by the difference in mean effectiveness between the two, estimates additional resources needed to achieve an increase of one unit of effectiveness. The ICER is then compared with published threshold values for cost-effective interventions. The cost model will include all necessary personnel, hardware, and material costs.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

TSET Health Promotion Research Center

🇺🇸

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath