MedPath

Comparison of 2',3'-Dideoxyinosine (Didanosine, ddI) and Zidovudine in Therapy of Patients With the AIDS Dementia Complex

Phase 2
Completed
Conditions
AIDS Dementia Complex
HIV Infections
Registration Number
NCT00000657
Lead Sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Brief Summary

To compare the safety and effectiveness of orally administered didanosine (ddI) with high dose orally administered zidovudine (AZT) in patients who develop or exhibit progression of the AIDS dementia complex (ADC) and who have not previously been intolerant to AZT at doses of up to 1000 mg/day.

HIV-infected or AIDS patients may develop ADC which causes damage to the nervous system. ADC may be caused by some action of the AIDS virus on the nervous system, although similar problems can be caused by other infections because the AIDS virus lowers the body's ability to fight other infections. It is important to determine whether symptoms are due to ADC or to some other infection since treatment varies for different conditions. AZT has been shown to be beneficial to people with ADC although its effectiveness has only been studied in a small number of patients. Studies suggest that higher doses of AZT are more likely to be effective than standard doses in improving symptoms of ADC.

Detailed Description

HIV-infected or AIDS patients may develop ADC which causes damage to the nervous system. ADC may be caused by some action of the AIDS virus on the nervous system, although similar problems can be caused by other infections because the AIDS virus lowers the body's ability to fight other infections. It is important to determine whether symptoms are due to ADC or to some other infection since treatment varies for different conditions. AZT has been shown to be beneficial to people with ADC although its effectiveness has only been studied in a small number of patients. Studies suggest that higher doses of AZT are more likely to be effective than standard doses in improving symptoms of ADC.

Patients are randomly assigned to receive either oral ddI or oral AZT.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (13)

San Francisco AIDS Clinic / San Francisco Gen Hosp

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

San Francisco, California, United States

San Francisco Gen Hosp

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

San Francisco, California, United States

Indiana Univ Hosp

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Charity Hosp / Tulane Univ Med School

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Louisiana State Univ Med Ctr / Tulane Med School

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Tulane Univ School of Medicine

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Johns Hopkins Hosp

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Univ of Minnesota

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Mount Sinai Med Ctr

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

New York, New York, United States

Univ of Rochester Medical Center

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Rochester, New York, United States

Scroll for more (3 remaining)
San Francisco AIDS Clinic / San Francisco Gen Hosp
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈSan Francisco, California, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

Β© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.