MedPath

Comparison of the effectiveness of two local anesthetics in tooth extractions

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Exodontia
Third molar
E06.645
Registration Number
RBR-2cwq2pr
Lead Sponsor
Éwerton Daniel Rocha Rodrigues
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Recruiting
Sex
Not specified
Target Recruitment
Not specified
Inclusion Criteria

Age between 18 and 30 years; present surgical site without current signs and symptoms of infection; present maxillary third molars in similar positions and with indication for extraction.

Exclusion Criteria

history of pregnancy or lactation, with a history of allergy to any drug used in the experiment; who are using drugs that alter bone metabolism; do not participate in all phases of the proposed research; use medications that interfere with the procedure on the day or week prior to the research, such as antibiotics , corticosteroids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Study & Design

Study Type
Intervention
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
It will be evaluated whether the vestibular infiltration of lidocaine and articaine is sufficient to promote anesthesia for performing maxillary third molar extractions. The anesthetic efficacy will be verified through probing in the vestibular and palatal regions. This study is expected to confirm that vestibular anesthetic infiltration is sufficient to promote anesthesia for maxillary tooth extraction.
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Secondary outcomes are not expected.
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath