跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03621150
NCT03621150Unknown不适用

Comparative Study Between Dynamic Ultrasound and MRI in Evaluation of Tendino-ligamentous Injuries Around the Ankle Joint

Assiut University0 个研究点目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2018年9月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
30
主要终点
Assessment of ankle tendi-ligamentous injury by dynamic ultrasound and MRI

研究概览

简要总结

Several imaging modalities, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound (US) can be used to evaluate the ankle. However, US has several benefits for the evaluation of the tendons and ligaments of the ankle, such as its suitability to be integrated with a dynamic assessment and a stress test, its ability to provide real-time analysis, its avoidance of the risk of radiation exposure, and its cost-effectiveness. US is especially powerful when used to evaluate a tear, subluxation, or dislocation in a dynamic examination and when performing a comparison with the contralateral extremity. Dynamic imaging with muscle contraction or passive movement is often helpful. Additionally, Doppler imaging may be used to distinguish small intrasubstance tears from blood vessels that can occur in a tendinopathic tendon.

详细描述

Ankle injuries account for approximately 14% of sports-related orthopedic emergency visits. Various pathological conditions can affect the ankle, including trauma, overuse disorders, and inflammatory conditions.

Several imaging modalities, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound (US) can be used to evaluate the ankle. However, US has several benefits for the evaluation of the tendons and ligaments of the ankle, such as its suitability to be integrated with a dynamic assessment and a stress test, its ability to provide real-time analysis, its avoidance of the risk of radiation exposure, and its cost-effectiveness. US is especially powerful when used to evaluate a tear, subluxation, or dislocation in a dynamic examination and when performing a comparison with the contralateral extremity. Dynamic imaging with muscle contraction or passive movement is often helpful. Additionally, Doppler imaging may be used to distinguish small intrasubstance tears from blood vessels that can occur in a tendinopathic tendon.

Approximately 85%of them are due to inversion forces and, therefore, involve the lateral collateral ligamentous complex. A Grade I sprain is a mild injury limited to microtears and stretching of the ligaments. Grade II sprains are partial macroscopic tears and in Grade III sprains the ligament has ruptured completely. There is general agreement that the overwhelming majority of Grade I and II sprains heal uneventfully with conservative care. Treatment of Grade III sprains is more controversial: some practitioners prefer operative repair, at least for high-performance athletes and others prefer a regimen of casting and physical therapy, which is the case in our institution. The proper role of imaging in the diagnosis of ankle sprains includes first of all conventional radiographs to ensure a fracture is not overlooked. Ultrasound is will be used to evaluate disorders of the musculoskeletal system, and because of their size and superficial location the ankle tendons can be well evaluated

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Only
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
15 Years 至 60 Years(Child, Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • patients complaining of unilateral ankle joint pain (acute or chronic).

排除标准

  • previous ankle surgery, interventional Intra-articular procedures (previous arthroscope, injections),
  • Systemic inflammatory disorders (collagen diseases),
  • Diagnosed osseous lesions.

结局指标

主要结局

Assessment of ankle tendi-ligamentous injury by dynamic ultrasound and MRI

时间窗: 1 month

Approximately 85%of anke tendo-ligamentous injuries are due to inversion forces and, therefore involve the lateral collateral ligamentous complex. * Grade I sprain is a mild injury limited to microtears and stretching of the ligaments. * Grade II sprains are partial macroscopic tears * Grade III sprains the ligament has ruptured completely.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mostafa Shaker Abolela Shehata

Principal investigator

Assiut University

相似试验