Clinical Performance and Stability of Different Types of Implant Supported Overdenture
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Complete Edentulism
- Sponsor
- National Research Centre, Egypt
- Enrollment
- 6
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Assessment of change in implants clinical performance throughout the follow-up period.
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
A Total number of 36 implants were installed in 6 patients having mandibular single denture.
The patients were divided into two groups according to the definitive prosthesis.
Group I received ball and socket retained mandibular implant overdenture while Group II received cement retained implant supported fixed bridges.
Detailed Description
Implant's stability, clinical performance (gingival index, pocket depth, plaque index and bleeding on probing) and patient's satisfaction were performed after 15, 30,60 and 90 days after prosthesis delivery
Investigators
Asmaa Nabil Elboraey
Associate Professor
National Research Centre, Egypt
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •highly co-operative
- •non-smoker
- •systemically free from any chronic diseases
Exclusion Criteria
- •immunocompromised patients
- •patients having knife edge, flat or flabby ridge,
- •patients having T. M. J disorders
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Assessment of change in implants clinical performance throughout the follow-up period.
Time Frame: on the 15th, 30th, 60th and 90th days of over denture insertion.
Assessment of change in pocket depth, plaque index and bleeding on probing) around the implant abutments. by periodontal probe.
Assessment of change in implant stability
Time Frame: on the 15th, 30th, 60th and 90th days of overdenture insertion
Assessment of implant stability by device ( Ostell device)
Secondary Outcomes
- Assessment of patient satisfaction(on the 90th day of prosthesis delivery)