跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06009900
NCT06009900尚未招募不适用

Safety and Efficacy of Low-intensity Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trail

Tongji Hospital5 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 860 人开始时间: 2023年9月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
860
试验地点
5
主要终点
Treatment effectiveness

研究概览

简要总结

This study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled research design. This study takes classic NSAIDs treatment as a control, and it will take patients' pain relief, functional improvement, sleep quality improvement, and adverse reactions as the main and secondary evaluation indicators to explore the safety and effectiveness of weak laser treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain, determining the dominant disease in the treatment of Chronic pain.

详细描述

Research purpose:

Chronic musculoskeletal pain is the most common clinical Chronic pain. Non-steroidal drugs are the most commonly used therapeutic drugs, but their effects on improving the body function are limited. At present, the pain diagnosis and treatment guidelines recommend that non-drug treatment should be used as a first-line treatment measure. Low intensity laser therapy can alleviate chronic musculoskeletal pain through multiple effects such as anti-inflammatory, promoting blood circulation, and promoting tissue repair. However, a large number of high-quality clinical studies are still needed to confirm its effectiveness. In view of this, this study aims to investigate the safety and effectiveness of dual wavelength weak laser therapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain independently developed in China, in order to clarify the clinical application value of this technology.

Research protocol:

This study is an intervention study. The participants will be assigned to different treatment groups (drug therapy group or low intensity laser therapy) to receive corresponding treatment. At the end of treatment and 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment, the researchers will evaluate treatment efficacy through a questionnaire survey.

This study will (1) compare the degree of pain relief, functional improvement, sleep quality, quality of daily life, and incidence of adverse reactions in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain after receiving weak laser therapy and NSAIDs treatment; (2) study the analgesic effect of low intensity laser therapy on different types of chronic musculoskeletal pain, and determine the advantageous disease types for this treatment.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age ≥ 18 years old;
  • Chronic musculoskeletal pain (including cervical spondylosis, periarthritis of shoulder, osteoarthritis, back muscle Fasciitis, lumbar disc herniation) was diagnosed, and the pain lasted for more than 3 months;
  • The degree of pain before treatment was mild to moderate (NRS score<7 points);
  • Can cooperate in completing consultation and scale evaluation;
  • Sign an informed consent form.

排除标准

  • Previous spinal surgery or severe spinal diseases (such as fractures, tumors, inflammation, and infectious diseases);
  • Suffering from serious systemic diseases, including liver and kidney dysfunction, cardio cerebral, vascular disease, decompensated metabolic syndrome;
  • Serious skin diseases (skin cancer, erysipelas, severe eczema, severe dermatitis, severe psoriasis, lupus, Hives);
  • Suffering from mental disorders, intellectual disabilities, epilepsy and other diseases;
  • Moderate to severe depressive state;
  • Have a history of drug abuse, drug abuse, and alcohol abuse;
  • Individuals with contraindications to NSAIDs or laser therapy;
  • Pregnant women;
  • Recently participated in other clinical studies.

研究组 & 干预措施

Non-steroidal drug (Celecoxib) group

Active Comparator

Oral Celecoxib 200mg/time, twice a day, for three consecutive weeks.

干预措施: Non-steroidal drug (Celecoxib) group (Drug)

Weak laser treatment group

Experimental

Low intensity laser treatment: Both patients and doctors wear goggles during the irradiation process. Using 810nm (infrared)/658nm (red) dual wavelength output for direct skin contact point irradiation, the maximum output power is 100mW (red)/60mW (infrared). Select the treatment site based on the patient's anatomical positioning (muscle and tendon attachment points, nerve distribution aggregation points) and/or pain points, and perform spot laser irradiation. Low intensity laser treatment process: Treat once a day for 15 minutes each time, with 5 consecutive days of treatment and 2 days of rest per week. The patient received a total of 3 weeks (15 times) of low intensity laser treatment.

干预措施: Low intensity laser treatment (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Treatment effectiveness

时间窗: the end of treatment (day21)

At the end of treatment (day21), the pain NRS (0, no pain; 10, worst pain imaginable) of patients are collected. These data are used to calculate the percentage of the difference between them and pain NRS of patients before treatment, relative to the latter. Then, this study calculates the proportion of patients with a decrease in NRS score of ≥ 30% in total patients. This proportion is defined as the treatment effectiveness rate.

次要结局

  • the proportion of patients with a decrease in NRS score of ≥ 30% 1 month after treatment(1 month after treatment)
  • the proportion of patients with a decrease in NRS score of ≥ 50% 3 months after treatment(3 months after treatment)
  • NRS 2 months after treatment(2 months after treatment)
  • BPI 1 month after treatment(1 month after treatment)
  • EQ-5D at the end of treatment (day21)(the end of treatment (day21))
  • EQ-5D 2 months after treatment(2 months after treatment)
  • HADS 2 months after treatment(2 months after treatment)
  • HADS 1 month after treatment(1 month after treatment)
  • the proportion of patients with a decrease in NRS score of ≥ 30% 2 months after treatment(2 months after treatment)
  • the proportion of patients with a decrease in NRS score of ≥ 50% 1 month after treatment(1 month after treatment)
  • NRS at the end of treatment (day21)(the end of treatment (day21))
  • BPI at the end of treatment (day21)(the end of treatment (day21))
  • BPI 2 months after treatment(2 months after treatment)
  • BPI 3 months after treatment(3 months after treatment)
  • RMDQ at the end of treatment (day21)(the end of treatment (day21))
  • the proportion of patients with a decrease in NRS score of ≥ 30% 3 months after treatment(3 months after treatment)
  • the proportion of patients with a decrease in NRS score of ≥ 50% at the end of treatment(the end of treatment (day21))
  • the proportion of patients with a decrease in NRS score of ≥ 50% 2 months after treatment(2 months after treatment)
  • RMDQ 2 months after treatment(2 months after treatment)
  • NRS 1 month after treatment(1 month after treatment)
  • NRS 3 months after treatment(3 months after treatment)
  • RMDQ 1 month after treatment(1 month after treatment)
  • RMDQ 3 months after treatment(3 months after treatment)
  • PSQI 3 months after treatment(3 months after treatment)
  • PSQI 2 months after treatment(2 months after treatment)
  • PSQI 1 month after treatment(1 month after treatment)
  • HADS 3 months after treatment(3 months after treatment)
  • HADS at the end of treatment (day21)(the end of treatment (day21))
  • PSQI at the end of treatment (day21)(the end of treatment (day21))
  • EQ-5D 1 month after treatment(1 month after treatment)
  • EQ-5D 3 months after treatment(3 months after treatment)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (5)

Loading locations...

相似试验