Using Question Prompt Lists During Pediatric Asthma Visits to Increase Adolescent Involvement

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Asthma

Interventions: Behavioral: Educational Video and Question Prompt List

Registration Number: NCT02498834

Lead Sponsor: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to conduct a randomized controlled trial with English and Spanish-speaking adolescents to compare the effectiveness of an adolescent "asthma question prompt list" with a supportive educational video intervention with usual care.

The hypothesis of this study is that by showing the parents and adolescents the educational video and then providing the adolescents with the one-page "asthma question prompt lists" to use during their visits will improve: (a) asthma control, (b) adolescent self-efficacy in managing asthma, and (c) adolescent quality-of-life.

Detailed Description: The study uses a randomized controlled trial design stratified by provider to assess the impact of an adolescent "asthma question prompt list" combined with a supportive educational video emphasizing the importance of adolescent involvement and question-asking on communication during pediatric visits. This application is based on Social Cognitive Theory. Self-confidence or self-efficacy is a central component of Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) Application of Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) in asthma populations has shown that technical advice from providers is one external factor that can improve asthma management self-efficacy. Additionally, personal beliefs, such as outcome expectations, and family factors, such as parent and adolescent responsibility for asthma self-management, have been shown to affect adolescent self-efficacy and disease management outcomes. Prior work has found that adolescent self-efficacy in asthma management correlates strongly with health status, adherence, asthma medication device technique, asthma symptoms, and impact of illness on the family.

All adolescents will have their medical visits audio recorded. The adolescent will be interviewed after his/her medical visit while his/her caregiver/parent completes a survey at the time of study enrollment. This same procedure will be used when the adolescent and caregiver/parents return for the 6- and 12-month follow-up visits.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 359

Inclusion Criteria

ages 11 to 17 years;
speak and read English or Spanish;
have persistent asthma;
are present for an acute or follow-up asthma visit or a well-child visit;
and have previously visited the clinic at least once for asthma.

Adolescents' parents will be eligible if they are at least 18 years of age, speak and read English or Spanish, and are the legal guardian of the adolescent.

Exclusion Criteria

present for gastrointestinal complaints or other non-asthma related acute illness.

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Educational Video and Question Prompt List	Educational Video and Question Prompt List	Parents and adolescents in this group will watch a short educational video in English or Spanish on an iPad about the importance of encouraging adolescents to ask questions and to be involved during their pediatric asthma visits to improve their self-management skills. Also, the adolescents in this group will be handed a question prompt list to complete, which will be collected after the medical visit.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Number of Participants Achieving Asthma Control	12 month follow-up	This will be measured via the 5-item Asthma Control Test, responses are summed to indicate a score ranging from 5 (poor asthma control) to 25 (complete asthma control). A higher score means a better outcome. A score of above 19 is considered "well controlled".
Adolescent Asthma Management Self-efficacy Score	12 month follow-up	Adolescent asthma management self-efficacy was measured using a 14-item scale that has been shown to have a reliability of 0.87. Prior work in asthma has found asthma management self-efficacy to change in response to an intervention. Scores range from 14 to 70 and a higher score means a better outcome.
Asthma Quality-of-life Score	12 month follow-up	Adolescent quality-of-life was measured as a continuous variable. The investigators used the standardized version of the Juniper pediatric asthma quality-of-life questionnaire. The questionnaire contains 23 items and has a reliability of 0.84. Scores can range from 1.0 to 7.0, and a higher score means a better outcome.