MedPath

Efficacy of Mobilization With Post- Isometric Relaxation in Neck Pain Associated With Myofascial Trigger Points

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Mechanical Neck Pain
Interventions
Other: Post Isometric relaxation Technique (PIR)
Other: Cervical Mobilization (CM)
Other: conventional treatment
Registration Number
NCT05684809
Lead Sponsor
Najran University
Brief Summary

purpose of the study: to determine the effectiveness of cervical mobilization with PIR in reducing pain and improving neck ROM and function in people with mechanical neck pain associated with MTrPs

Detailed Description

This study will be based on a randomized controlled design which will be comparative in nature. Participants will be recruited using the convenience sampling method and will be randomly divided into two groups A and B respectively. Thirty participants of mechanical neck pain associated with upper Trapezius trigger point pain will be recruited from the Physiotherapy department, at the Najran University, Saudi Arabia. Study objectives and procedure will be properly explained and written informed consent will be obtained at the beginning of the study. All the participants will be randomly assigned into two equal groups A and B.

Group A will be receiving the hot pack, active Stretching, isometric exercise intervention, and PIR technique while group B will receive the hot pack, active Stretching, isometric exercise intervention, and cervical Mobilization.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
33
Inclusion Criteria
  • age 20-40 years,
  • having mechanical neck pain located in the neck or scapular regions along with 1-2 MTrPs which,
  • on palpation replicated their chief complaints in the upper Trapezius muscle (unilateral).
Exclusion Criteria
  • known cases of fibromyalgia syndrome,
  • cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy,
  • history of cervical spine surgery,
  • congenital or acquired postural deformity, presence of MTrPs in bilateral upper Trapezius muscles,
  • patients who received any treatment for their pain one month prior to the study.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group APost Isometric relaxation Technique (PIR)in addition to Conventional treatment, PIR and cervical mobilization were given
Group BPost Isometric relaxation Technique (PIR)in addition to Conventional treatment, PIR were given
Group ACervical Mobilization (CM)in addition to Conventional treatment, PIR and cervical mobilization were given
Group Aconventional treatmentin addition to Conventional treatment, PIR and cervical mobilization were given
Group Bconventional treatmentin addition to Conventional treatment, PIR were given
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain intensity3 Weeks

The pain intensity was assessed Using a numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), Its a 11 point scale, where zero indicates no pain and 10 indicates severe pain

Neck Disability Index3 Weeks

The Neck Disability was assessed using a neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire, the minimum value 0- and the maximum value is 50

Range of Motion3 Weeks

The Neck Side Flexion range of motion was assessed using cervical range of motion(CROM) device

Pain Pressure Threshold3 Weeks

The Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) was assessed using an algometer algometer

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hashim Ahmed

🇸🇦

Najrān, Najran, Saudi Arabia

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath