A Retrospective Study on Comparing Different Cervical Cancer Screening Methods and Factors Linked to HPV Infection in a Tertiary Cancer Clinic
- Conditions
- Neoplasms,
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2025/04/084075
- Lead Sponsor
- NA
- Brief Summary
Cervical cancer is a major public health problem worldwide, being the fourth most common cause of cancer and death among women. About one in every 70 women globally develops cervical cancer at some point in her life, with India accounting for a significant portion of the deaths from this disease. There are three main ways to screen for cervical cancer: Pap smear, HPV DNA testing, and visual inspection with acetic acid
Early detection of HPV infection and precancerous lesions through regular screenings can significantly reduce the incidence of cervical cancer and improve treatment outcomes. By identifying risk factors associated with HPV infection and CIN, targeted preventive measures and interventions can be implemented more effectively. Overall, this study contributes to the global effort to combat cervical cancer by informing healthcare policies and resource allocation strategies based on evidence-based screening methods.
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening methods by comparing the accuracy of different screening methods by analyzing the medical records of 26,400 women who underwent screenings between 2008 and 2023 at the Department of Preventive Oncology.
These findings will provide valuable insights into the performance of each screening method, aiding healthcare providers in selecting the most effective approach, especially in resource-constrained settings.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 26400
Women aged 18 years above Women who Underwent cervical cancer screening by VIA, cytology and HPV DNA test Women Underwent diagnostic evaluation by Colposcopy.
Inadequate data despite the attempt will be excluded from the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Prevalence and Determinants Of HPV infection & CIN: 12 Months a. proportion of screened women testing positive for HPV infection. 12 Months b. Prevalence of different grades of cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN1, CIN2, CIN3) 12 Months 2. HPV Genotype Distribution and Association with Cervical Lesions: 12 Months a. Proportion of HPV-positive women with abnormal cytology results. 12 Months b. association between HPV genotype and cytological abnormalities such as ASCUS,LSIL and HSIL 12 Months c. Association of Socio-demographic, clinical, and behavioral factors with HPV infection and CIN. 12 Months a. Frequency of different HPV genotypes detected. 12 Months b. association of specific high-risk HPV genotypes with histologically confirmed precancerous (CIN2/3) and cancerous lesions. 12 Months 3. Association Between HPV infection and cytological abnormalities: 12 Months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Comparison of Cervical Cancer Screening Methods & Diagnostic Accuracy: a)Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Tata Memorial Hospital
🇮🇳Mumbai, MAHARASHTRA, India
Tata Memorial Hospital🇮🇳Mumbai, MAHARASHTRA, IndiaDr Sharmila PimplePrincipal investigator09223207939pimplesharmila@gmail.com