MedPath

Implementation of Telerehabilitation as Modality of Patient Follow-up on the Waiting List of a Clinic

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Orthopedic Disorder
Rehabilitation
Interventions
Other: Phone call follow-up
Other: Telerehabilitation follow-up
Registration Number
NCT03991858
Lead Sponsor
Université de Sherbrooke
Brief Summary

This study responds to the need to validate the feasibility and effectiveness of a telerehabilitation home monitoring program for users receiving a preliminary assessment while waiting for rehabilitation services at the outpatient physiotherapy clinic. The specific objectives are as followed: 1) Evaluate the implementation of telerehabilitation monitoring (TELE-FOLLOW-UP); 2) Evaluate the effectiveness of TELE-FOLLOW-UP compared to the usual phone call; 3) Evaluate user satisfaction for these two modes of service delivery; 4) Identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation of TELE-FOLLOW-UP. In order to meet the objectives of the study, mixed methods will be used. A randomized clinical trial will be used to achieve objectives 1, 2 and 3. The investigators plan to recruit 142 patients. Two groups will be formed: 1) TELE-FOLLOW-UP group: users who will receive follow-up by telerehabilitation; 2) PHONE-FOLLOW-UP group: those who will receive follow-up by a phone call.

Detailed Description

Rational : The rehabilitation service offered at the Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS) for non-hospitalized patients is performed in outpatient clinics. However, the demand for this service far exceeds the supply, so the take-up time is very long. Recognizing the threatened short-term accessibility, this outpatient clinic has put in place an initial assessment for any service request. The goal is to conduct a preliminary assessment of the condition of the user to teach an exercise and education program. In addition, sporadic monitoring is recommended to promote the effectiveness of the intervention.

To date, the follow-up of this preliminary assessment is done by a phone call from the professional to the patient one month later. However, it is noted that this type of monitoring is not optimal for various reasons, in particular because of the absence of visual contact with the user to allow appropriate feedback from the professional on the exercise execution. In this context, the possibility of having a follow-up by a physiotherapist using telerehabilitation, an application of information technologies allowing a synchronous auditory and visual link, would be an innovative way of increasing the effectiveness of the intervention. This study therefore responds to the need to validate the feasibility and effectiveness of a telerehabilitation home monitoring program for users receiving a preliminary assessment while waiting for physiotherapist at the outpatient physiotherapy clinic. The results of this study will be relevant to clinicians and managers and will undeniably influence the provision of rehabilitation services.

Objectives: The specific objectives are as followed: 1) Evaluate the implementation of telerehabilitation monitoring (TELE-FOLLOW-UP); 2) Evaluate the effectiveness of TELE-FOLLOW-UP compared to the usual phone call; 3) Evaluate user satisfaction for these two modes of service delivery; 4) Identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation of TELE-FOLLOW-UP.

Methodology : In order to meet the objectives of the study, mixed methods will be used. A randomized clinical trial will be used to achieve objectives 1, 2 and 3. The investigators plan to recruit 142 patients. Two groups will be formed: 1) TELE-FOLLOW-UP group: users who will receive follow-up by telerehabilitation; 2) PHONE-FOLLOW-UP group: those who will receive follow-up by a phone call. In order to complete Objective 4, a qualitative exploratory and descriptive study will be conducted using individual interviews (clinicians and health care managers) and focus groups (participants).

The successful implementation of this project will bring a unique experience in Quebec of implementing telerehabilitation in a health care facility. The CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS could become a leader in sharing its experience for large-scale implementation in Quebec. The application in orthopedic outpatient clinics may be generalized to other clientele by increasing accessibility to rehabilitation services for clients where accessibility is an issue

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
142
Inclusion Criteria
  • To present a non-urgent condition (status determined during the initial evaluation at the clinic)
  • To be apt to understand simple statement
  • To have access to internet at and possess an electronic tablet or a computer at
Exclusion Criteria
  • Do not understand French or English

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Phone follow-upPhone call follow-upPhone follow-up initiated by the health care professional one month after the initial evaluation at the external rehabilitation clinic.
Telerehabilitation follow-upTelerehabilitation follow-upTelerehabilitation follow-up initiated by the health care professional one month after the initial evaluation at the external rehabilitation clinic.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in pain through timeDay 0, 1 month

0-10 pain scale (0= no pain, 10 = worst pain)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in quality of life through timeDay 0, 12 months

Evaluate quality of life related to physical and mental state (Questionnaire SF-6Dv2 (Health Utility Survey)). This questionnaire provide a multidimensional generic measure of health-related quality of life. In its current form, this questionnaire includes six questions on different aspects of physical and mental health. The score will be converted to QALY (quality-adjusted life year).The cost-utility analysis (CUA) is an increasingly used method to help health decision-maker. The CUA uses the Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) that combines the length of life with the health related quality of life (HRQoL) into a single score.

Satisfaction with service received1 month

Questionnaire about satisfaction of health care received. The satisfaction construct is determined by three distinct factors which include satisfaction with:

1) the therapist relationship, 2) the services provided, and 3) the organization of services. This tool includes 26 questions, scored on a four-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated based on average satisfaction for the three factors, with higher scores indicating higher levels of satisfaction (on a 0-100 scale)

Direct and indirect costs related to intervention12 months

Indirect and direct costs related to intervention. Direct costs are the costs that are essentials for clinical follow-up and refer to the physiotherapists salary and the acquisition of technological equipment (tablet or computer) used by the patient. Indirect costs are needed to optimize the performance of clinical follow-up and take into account the patient's expenses and / or any other necessary expenses related to his/her participation in the RT program. A home-made questionnaire will be administered to collect information about costs.

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Research Centre on Aging

🇨🇦

Sherbrooke, Canada

Research Center on Aging

🇨🇦

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath