MedPath

Halt Growth of Liver Tumors From Uveal Melanoma With Closure of Liver Artery Following Injection of GM-CSF

Phase 2
Completed
Conditions
Uveal Melanoma
Liver Metastases
Interventions
Drug: GM-CSF
Procedure: Embolization
Registration Number
NCT00661622
Lead Sponsor
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
Brief Summary

Patients with uveal melanoma metastatic to the liver will be treated with embolization of the hepatic artery every 4 weeks. GM-CSF (granulocyte-macrophage colony simulating factor) or normal saline will be injected into one of the liver arteries with an oily contrast dye, Ethiodol. This is followed by blockage of the artery with small pieces of gelatin sponge (embolization). It is hoped with this novel approach that:

* tumor cells will die due to a loss of their blood supply,

* local inflammatory reactions induced by GM-CSF will kill remaining tumor cells, and

* a systemic immune response against tumor cells may develop.

Detailed Description

Patients with uveal melanoma metastatic to the liver will be treated with embolization of the hepatic artery every 4 weeks. GM-CSF (granulocyte-macrophage colony simulating factor) or normal saline will be injected into one of the liver arteries with an oily contrast dye, Ethiodol. This is followed by blockage of the artery with small pieces of gelatin sponge (embolization).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
53
Inclusion Criteria
  • Metastatic uveal melanoma in the liver with histological confirmation
  • Ability/willingness to give informed consent
  • ECOG performance status of 0 or 1
  • Adequate renal, liver and bone marrow function
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Solitary liver metastasis that is amenable to surgical removal
  • Presence of symptomatic liver failure including ascites and hepatic encephalopathy
  • Presence of extra-hepatic metastases
  • Untreated brain metastases
  • Uncontrolled hypertension or congestive heart failure or acute myocardial infarction within 6 months of entry
  • Presence of any other medical complication that imply survival of less than six months
  • Uncontrolled sever bleeding tendency or active GI bleeding
  • Significant allergic reaction to contrast dye or GM-CSF
  • Immunosuppressive treatments such as systemic steroids, radiation to pelvis or systemic chemotherapy within 4 weeks
  • Previous embolization of the hepatic artery or intrahepatic arterial chemotherapy of liver metastasis
  • Active hepatitis with serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) and serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) greater than 5 x normal
  • HIV infection positive by ELISA
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding women
  • Biliary obstruction, biliary stent or prior biliary surgery except cholecystectomy
  • Significant arteriovenous shunt identified on angiography of the hepatic artery
  • Occlusion of main portal vein or inadequate collateral flow around an occluded portal vein
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
ImmunoembolizationEmbolizationLiver embolization treatment with injection of GM-CSF.
Plain embolizationEmbolizationLiver embolization with normal saline injected in place of GM-CSF
ImmunoembolizationGM-CSFLiver embolization treatment with injection of GM-CSF.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Response of Liver MetastasesEvery 8 weeks

Complete response: Disappearance of all target and non-target liver lesions

Partial response: \>= 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (LD) relative to baseline sum LD with at least stable non-target liver lesions

Stable disease: Absence of change which would qualify as response or progression

Progression: \>= 20% increase in the sum LD in target liver lesions or unequivocal progression of non-target liver lesions in the treated lobe(s) or appearance of one or more new liver lesions \>= 10mm in the treated lobe(s)

Overall Response RateBaseline then 3 to 4 weeks after every 2 treatments

Clinical response in the liver metastases will be evaluated after every two embolizations using CT scans or MRI of the abdomen. The sum of the longest diameter (LD) of up to 6 target lesions will be used to determine response. Target indicator lesions will be identified and measured as baseline prior to the first embolization. The same target lesions will then be measured 3 to 4 weeks after every two treatments. The sum of the baseline LDs will be compared to the sum of the LDs after every two treatments.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Overall SurvivalBaseline to death

Measured from the start of the treatment to death of patients

Median Progression Free SurvivalBaseline to time of progression

Measured from the start of the treatment to confirmation of progression of disease by either imaging tests or physical examination.

Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of one or more new liver lesions \>= 10mm in the treated lobe(s).

Systemic Progression Free SurvivalBaseline to time of progression

Measured from the start of the treatment to confirmation of progression of disease by either imaging tests or physical examination.

Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of one or more new liver lesions \>= 10mm in the treated lobe(s).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Thomas Jefferson University

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath