Early Tracheostomy in Ventilated Stroke Patients
- Conditions
- Ischemic StrokeIntracerebral HemorrhageSubarachnoid Hemorrhage
- Interventions
- Procedure: Early TracheostomyProcedure: Late Tracheostomy
- Registration Number
- NCT01261091
- Lead Sponsor
- Heidelberg University
- Brief Summary
Patients with severe ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes, who require mechanical ventilation, have a particularly bad prognosis. If they require long-term ventilation, their orotracheal tube needs to be, like in any other intensive care patient, replaced by a shorter tracheal tube below the larynx. This so called tracheostomy might be associated with advantages such as less demand of narcotics and pain killers, less lesions in mouth and larynx, better mouth hygiene, safer airway, more patient comfort and earlier mobilisation. The best timepoint for tracheostomy in stroke, however, is not known. This study investigates the potential benefits of early tracheostomy in ventilated critically ill patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke.
- Detailed Description
Background: Tracheostomy is a common procedure in critical care patients. Advantages of a short tracheal tube compared to a long orotracheal one are the avoidance of laryngeal lesions and sinusitis, facilitation of nursing care and physiotherapy and the reduction of analgosedatives. The optimal point in time for tracheostomy is still unknown, but it is commonly done not later than 2-3 weeks and after one or several failed extubation trials. Studies in different sets of critical care patients have suggested additional advantages of early tracheostomy: less pneumonias and other complications, more patient comfort, less analgosedation, shorter duration of ventilation and of ICU stay. These questions have not been looked at in non-traumatic neurocritical care patients, although these might have a special weaning benefit by early tracheostomy, being mainly compromised in securing their airway, but not in breathing.
Method: Non-traumatic Neurocritical care patients with ischemic strokes, intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage so severly affected that 2 weeks of ventilation need are estimated, are principally eligible for the study. After randomization, one group receives tracheostomy within the first 3 days after intubation. The other group stays orotracheally intubated and is either weaned and extubated or receives tracheostomy within 7 to 14 days after intubation. Tracheostomy is done as percutaneous dilatation by neurologists.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- age > 18 years
- informed consent from legal representative
- non-traumatic cerebrovascular disease
- Estimated ventilation need for at least 2 weeks
- age < 18 years
- informed consent not obtainable
- intubated for more than 3 days
- death within 3 weeks likely
- severe chronic pulmonary disease
- severe chronic cardiac disease
- emergency situation
- intracranial pressure difficult to control
- need for a permanent tracheostoma
- contraindications for dilatative tracheostomy
- severe coagulopathy
- severe respiration difficulties
- intubation/extubation/tube exchange difficulties
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Early Tracheostomy Early Tracheostomy Patients randomized to early tracheostomy receive (preferably dilatative) tracheostomy within 3 days from intubation. Prolonged Intubation Late Tracheostomy Patients randomized to this arm will be tried to wean off the ventilator and get (an) extubation trial(s) if regarded feasible. In case of failure or non-feasibility, they receive tracheostomy between days 7 to 14 from intubation.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay (ICU-LOS) open The primary endpoint is assessed as days from admission to until discharge from the intensive care unit.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time of ICU-dependence open This secondary endpoint is assessed as days from admission to a pre-defined status that would allow discharge from ICU (absence of active infection, vasopressors, pulmonary and cardial instability etc.)
Vasopressor Dependence within ICU-LOS This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days spent under vasopressors.
Time of Antibiotic Treatment within ICU-LOS This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days under antibiotic treatment
Pneumonias within ICU-LOS This secondary endpoint is assessed as episodes (pre-defined by diagnostic criteria) of pneumonia.
Occurrence and Duration of Sepsis within ICU-LOS This secondary endpoint is assessed as the number of episodes and duration of sepsis as pre-defined by diagnostic criteria.
Number and type of complications associated with the procedure 10 days post tracheostomy This secondary endpoint is assessed as the number and types of complications arelated to tracheostomy (i.e. bleeding, mispositioning, malfunction, replacement demand,etc.).
Cost of Treatment within ICU-LOS This secondary endpoint is assessed as the total ICU-costs etsimated by length of stay and severety-derived DRG-multiplicator of each individual patient.
Functional Outcome admission, discharge, at 6 months This secondary endpoint is assessed as the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at the above named timepoints.
Mortality during stay, after 6 months This secondary endpoint is assessed as time and type of death during the ICU-stay and 6 months after admission.
Hospital Length of Stay open This secondary endpoint is assessed as days spent at the recruiting hospital from admission to discharge.
Duration of Ventilation open This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days on the ventilator until the patient is ventilator-independent for 24 h.
Duration and Quality of Weaning Within ventilation time This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days spent under the possible application of a weaning protocol, and spent within specific phases of such a protocol.
Time of Analgosedation Dependence within ICU-LOS This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days requiring the application of sedatives and analgesics which are also specified.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
NeuroIntensive Care Unit, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg
🇩🇪Heidelberg, Germany