MedPath

Pragmatic Approach To Esophageal Dilation

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Dysphagia
Swallowing Disorders
Registration Number
NCT04542551
Lead Sponsor
University of Louisville
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to better understand the role of a technique called esophageal dilation in patients who complain of trouble swallowing. In patients with esophageal stricture we want to determine if the size of the esophageal dilator makes a difference in symptoms and outcomes. In patients who do not have an obvious esophageal stricture we want to determine if esophageal dilation is an effective therapy in these patients.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
34
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Patients with esophageal dysphagia who are 18 years old or older.
  2. Patients with dysphagia undergoing Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).
  3. Patients who are able to provide consent for the study.
  4. Patients with known esophageal stricture that may have or may not have been dilated before.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Patients with malignant stricture.
  2. Pregnant women.
  3. Patients with a personal history of esophageal perforation.
  4. Patients with achalasia, or globus sensation.
  5. Any accessory procedures, like esophageal stenting, excision, steroid injection, or dysphagia treatment currently being done at outside facility.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in subjective symptoms of dysphagia in patients without strictures undergoing empiric dilation. As measured by dysphagia score.Baseline, every 8 weeks for 12 months

Evaluate the change in dysphagia (the dysphagia score is used to assess for severity of dysphagia, score ranges from 0 to 5 with the higher score indicates greater degree of severity) in patients without strictures undergoing empiric dilation.

Change in ability to tolerate diet in patients without strictures undergoing empiric dilation. As measured by diet score.Baseline, every 8 weeks for 12 months

Evaluate the change in diet score (the diet score is used to assess the ability of the patient to tolerate food, score ranges from 0 to 5 with the higher score indicates inability to eat) in patients without strictures undergoing empiric dilation.

Change in subjective symptoms of dysphagia in patients with strictures undergoing dilation with 60-Fr vs 46-Fr for non severe stricture, and 51-Fr vs 42-Fr for severe stricture. As measured by dysphagia score.Baseline, "every 8 weeks (for non severe stricture)" "every 4 weeks (for severe stricture)" for 12 months

Evaluate the change in dysphagia (the dysphagia score is used to assess for severity of dysphagia, score ranges from 0 to 5 with the higher score indicates greater degree of severity) in patients with strictures undergoing dilation with 60-Fr vs 46-Fr for non severe stricture, and 51-Fr vs 42-Fr for severe stricture.

Change in ability to tolerate diet in patients with strictures undergoing dilation with 60-Fr vs 46-Fr for non severe stricture, and 51-Fr vs 42-Fr for severe stricture. As measured by diet score.Baseline, "every 8 weeks (for non severe stricture)" "every 4 weeks (for severe stricture)" for 12 months

Evaluate the change in diet score (the diet score is used to assess the ability of the patient to tolerate food, score ranges from 0 to 5 with the higher score indicates inability to eat) in patients with strictures undergoing dilation with 60-Fr vs 46-Fr for non severe stricture, and 51-Fr vs 42-Fr for severe stricture.

Achievement of complete relief of dysphagiaEnd of study (12 months)

Evaluate the number of patients in each study arm that achieve complete relief of dysphagia for the remainder of the study.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Dilation sessions required to achieved sustainable change in dysphagia and diet scoreEnd of study (12 months)

Evaluate the number of dilation sessions needed to achieve sustainable change in dysphagia and diet scores in patients with non-severe and severe stricture.

Duration of sustained change between sessionsEvery 8 weeks (for non severe stricture)" "every 4 weeks (for severe stricture)" for 12 months

Evaluate the average duration between dilation sessions in patients undergoing dilation for non-severe and severe strictures.

Reduction of more than 3 sizes dilators in subsequent dilation sessions to achieve the goal dilationEvery 8 weeks (for non severe stricture) and every 4 weeks (for severe stricture) for 1 year

Evaluate if more than 3 size reduction from target diameter is needed as a result of tactile resistance for subsequent dilation sessions in patients undergoing dilation for non-severe and severe stricture.

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

University of Louisville Hospital

🇺🇸

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

UofL health - Jewish hospital downtown

🇺🇸

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Louisville VA Medical Center

🇺🇸

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

University of Louisville Hospital
🇺🇸Louisville, Kentucky, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.