MedPath

Comparing Muscle Energy Technique and Bowen Therapy for Pain, Movement, and Disability in Text Neck Syndrome

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Text Neck Syndrome
Registration Number
NCT07189351
Lead Sponsor
University of Lahore
Brief Summary

This study compared the effects of Muscle Energy Technique and Bowen Therapy on patients with Text Neck Syndrome's pain, function ROM, and posture. Today, text neck syndrome is a growing issue. The majority of us experience this unpleasant condition to some extent. There is no study that has compared the effects of muscle energy technique and Bowen therapy, although they can both be quite effective in helping individuals with text neck syndrome reduce their discomfort, improve their range of motion, and improve their functional impairment. So, the goal of this study was to compare the two treatments' results in order to determine whether one was a better method for treating text neck syndrome patients' discomfort by enhancing range of motion and functional impairment.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
78
Inclusion Criteria
  • • Age 18-35 years

    • Both genders
    • Using smart phone more than 4 hours per day and pain from last 6 months.
    • Neck disability index greater than 10. (Seemal et al., 2022)
Exclusion Criteria
  • • Subjects who had signs of recent surgery.

    • Whiplash injury or open wounds.
    • Cervical spine pathologies like radiculopathies, disc herniation, spondylolisthesis, sensory changes in neck region..
    • Deformities like torticollis.
    • Any inflammatory or malignant type of pain.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
DisabilityBaseline, 3rd week, 6th week, and 3-week follow-up after treatment completion

Neck disability Index scale (NDI-U) This Neck Disability Index (NDI) scale assesses the degree of perceived pain in neck an the disability status based on daily activities and underlying cervical spine pain. Each section is scored on a 0 to 5 rating scale, in which zero means 'No pain' and 5 means 'Worst imaginable pain'. Points summed to a total score

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.