RIC (Remote Ischemic Conditioning) in Older Individuals
- Conditions
- Old AgeMobility LimitationDebility
- Registration Number
- NCT06476288
- Lead Sponsor
- Duke University
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a technique called remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) that aims to improve muscle strength, muscle mass, exercise tolerance, resilience (i.e. how well someone responds to a stressor), quality of life, physical activity, and physical function when added to rehabilitative exercise training in individuals over age 65 who have some difficulty with mobility.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Age: ≥ 65 years and referred to an exercise program for functional decline, deconditioning, or fall risk
- Unstable heart disease as determined by the investigator or study physician
- History of any orthopaedic, neurologic, or metabolic condition that would contraindicate exercise testing/training as determined by the investigator
- Cognitive inability to follow directions and safely participate in exercise
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Feasibility of study intervention as measured by the attrition rate Up to 6 weeks Attrition rate is expressed as a percentage and is calculated by dividing the number of non-completers by the total number of participants.
Feasibility of study intervention as measured by the number of exercise visits attended per participant Up to 6 weeks Feasibility of study intervention as measured by the number of participants who completed the study Up to 6 weeks Feasibility of study intervention as measured by the number of RIC home applications completed per participant Up to 6 weeks Acceptability of study intervention as measured by an Intervention Acceptability Questionnaire Up to 6 weeks Each participant will complete an Intervention Acceptability Questionnaire with responses on a 5-point Likert scale, where a higher score indicates greater acceptability.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Feasibility of collecting blood samples during study as measured by the success rate of collection Up to 6 weeks Change in Brief Resilience 5-point Likert Scale Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks) Higher score indicates greater resilience.
Change in muscle strength as measured by dynamometry Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks) Measurements made with isokinetic dynamometry, hand-held dynamometry and DXA scans completed at pre- and post-intervention.
Change in exercise tolerance as measured by VO2peak testing Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks) Change in vascular function as measured by arterial tonometry Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks) Change in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks) The SPPB measures changes in physical function.
Change in quality of life as measured by PROMIS-29 Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Duke University
🇺🇸Durham, North Carolina, United States
Duke University🇺🇸Durham, North Carolina, United States