MedPath

Virtual Body Project Groups Led by Peers Versus Clinicians

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Body Image
Eating Disorders
Interventions
Behavioral: Body Project
Behavioral: Psychoeducational control
Registration Number
NCT05993728
Lead Sponsor
Oslo University Hospital
Brief Summary

Eating disorders (EDs) are a group of illnesses associated with significant psychological and physiological consequences. Overall, only 20% of individuals with EDs receive treatment and treatment is effective for only about 25-35% for those who receive care. The development and implementation of effective prevention approaches for those at risk is therefore pivotal. The Body Project is the most effective ED prevention program for at-risk females according to meta-analyses, but reach has been limited since delivery has traditionally been in-person. Further research is warranted to examine cost-effective and easily accessible approaches to increase scalability and potential for broad implementation. With this application, the investigators therefore propose to examine the effectiveness of the Body Project in young females, a high-risk group, with the following main novel aspects: i) virtually-delivered Body Project groups to maximize reach; ii) peer-led versus clinician-led virtually-delivered Body Project groups; iii) the inclusion of objective measures to assess engagement of intervention targets (i.e., mediator).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
441
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age 16-25
  • Female identifying
  • Self-reported body image concerns
Exclusion Criteria
  • Ongoing eating disorder diagnosis requiring treatment or hospitalization

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Clinician-led Body ProjectBody ProjectParticipants randomized to this condition will take part in virtual Body Project groups led by clinicians.
Educational controlPsychoeducational controlParticipants randomized to the educational control group will receive educational videos on body image and eating disorders
Peer-led Body ProjectBody ProjectParticipants randomized to this condition will take part in virtual Body Project groups led by peers.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change over time in Body dissatisfactionBaseline/pretest, posttest right after intervention (an average of 8 weeks), and at follow-up after 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years

Assessed with the 10-item Body Dissatisfaction Scale (BDI; Berscheid et al., 2973) which assesses dissatisfaction with various body parts. Each item is scored on a scale of 1 = extremely dissatisfied to 5 = extremely satisfied. Lower scores indicate greater body dissatisfaction

Change over time in thin-ideal internalizationBaseline/pretest, posttest right after intervention (an average of 8 weeks), and at follow-up after 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years

Assessed with the 8-item Ideal-Body Stereotype Scale-Revised (Stice et al., 2017) which measures pursuit of the thin ideal. Each item is scored on a scale of 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Higher scores indicate greater belief in the thin-deal.

Change over time in eating disorder symptomsBaseline/pretest, posttest right after intervention (an average of 8 weeks), and at follow-up after 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years

Assessed with the 28-item self-report Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Responses range from 0-6, whith higher scores indicating more severe eating disorder psychopathology

Rate of eating disorder onsetBaseline/pretest, 1-year, and at 2-years

Assessed with the eating disorder diagnostic interview Eating Disorder Assessment-5 (EDA-5). This is a semi-structured clinician-led diagnostic interview, based on the diagnostic criteria in the diagnostic manual DSM-5, and is efficient to determine eating disorder diagnostic status. This outcome will be used to determine proportion of participants with an eating disorder diagnosis.

Negative affectBaseline/pretest, posttest right after intervention (an average of 8 weeks), and at follow-up after 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years

20 negative items from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Revised (PANAS-X) (Watson \& Clark, 1992) to measure negative affect. Higher scores indicate higher levels of negative affect. Responses range from 1-5

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change over time in appearance ideals and perceived pressuresBaseline/pretest, posttest right after intervention (an average of 8 weeks), and at follow-up after 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years

Assessed with the Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire (SATAQ-4R) (Schaefer et al., 2017). A total of 31 items are included, and responses range from 1-5. Higher scores indicate higher levels of internalization/pressures

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Oslo University Hospital

🇳🇴

Oslo, Norway

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath