跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05555810
NCT05555810尚未招募不适用

Suture Ligation Versus Clipping of Cystic Duct and Artery During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy . " A Prospective Comparative Study"

Assiut University0 个研究点目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2023年6月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
50
主要终点
safety and efficiency of closure of cystic duct and artery after cutting them during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

研究概览

简要总结

The investigators will compare between clipping and ligation of the cystic duct and the cystic artery in Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This is the main question that will be discussed in the review.

详细描述

cholecystectomy is the second most commonly intra-abdominal operation worldwide after Appendectomy. In standard surgery ,there are increase incidence of wound infection,bleeding , discomfort and hospital stay so laparoscopic surgery has become the best choice for treatment of symptomatic and uncomplicated Gall bladder stones and hernia repair.

Once laparoscopic cholecystectomy emerged controversies persist with regard to the best method to ligate the cystic duct and artery. They may be ligated by separate and multiple ligatures by absorbable suture material, or using absorbable clips.

Suture ligation of cystic duct appeared to be more cost effective.On the other hand, the application of clips shown to have some drawbacks such as dislodgement and bile leakage and increase liability of long term clip migration which resulted in biliary stone formation or bile duct stenosis and also they are expensive .Another complication of clips that they may ulcerated through the duodenum.

Ligation takes more time than applying a clip, and it needs well training, but it is feasible, cost- effective and safe alternative method to secure cystic duct and artery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

The Aim of this study is to compare the two different methods; Tie versus clipping, for securing cystic duct and artery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In terms of efficacy and safety, and also the difference in the times of operations in both methods

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • patients with cholecystitis admitted at Assuit University Hospital and planed for lap. cholecystectomy the period of the study

排除标准

  • Any case not candidate for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and we must do it by open technique .

结局指标

主要结局

safety and efficiency of closure of cystic duct and artery after cutting them during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

时间窗: one month

The investigators will seek to know the incidence of postoperative complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (as signs of biliary leakage as pain, jaundice and raised serum bilirubin level and follow up the drain inserted after doing laparoscopic cholecystectomy) then the investigators will make a comparison between incidence of these complication after closure of cystic duct and artery either by clipping or ligation by sutures. The investigators will try to know rate of advantages disadvantages of each technique also do our best to make strategies for improving efficiency and safety.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mohamed Gamal Sayed

principal investigator

Assiut University

相似试验

Suture Ligation Versus Clipping of Cystic Duct and... | 临床试验