MedPath

Comparing Analgesic Effects of Caudal and Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Pediatrics Undergoing Upper Abdominal Surgery

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Anesthesia, Local
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT04204343
Lead Sponsor
Istanbul University
Brief Summary

Upper abdominal surgeries are painful and pediatric patients who undergo these operations require effective postoperative pain control. Epidural and caudal blocks are considered to be the gold standard regional analgesia techniques. Currently, ultrasound guidance is commonly used for caudal block performances to demonstrate the cannula placement and the deposition of local anesthetic. Additionally, erector spinae plane block can be a safer alternative for blocking the similar dermatomes. In this study, the aim is to compare postoperative analgesic effects of these two ultrasound-guided techniques in pediatric patients. The primary outcome of this study is the follow-up of FLACC/VAS pain scores. Secondary outcomes are time to first analgesic requirement, number of patients who require rescue analgesic, possible side effects, time to first mobilization, length of hospital stay and chronic pain due to incision after 2 months.

Detailed Description

Upper abdominal surgeries are painful and pediatric patients who undergo these operations require effective postoperative pain control. Blockade of dermatomes between T6 and L1 commonly provides effective postoperative analgesia. Epidural and caudal blocks are considered to be the gold standard regional analgesia techniques as they provide both somatic and visceral analgesia. Currently, ultrasound guidance is commonly used for caudal block performances to demonstrate the cannula placement and the deposition of local anesthetic. Additionally, erector spinae plane block can be a safer alternative for blocking the similar dermatomes. In the present study, the aim is to compare postoperative analgesic effects of these two ultrasound-guided techniques in pediatric patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery. The primary outcome of this study is the follow-up of FLACC/VAS pain scores. Secondary outcomes are time to first analgesic requirement, number of patients who require rescue analgesic, possible side effects (nausea, vomiting, itching, urinary retention, bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression), time to first mobilization, length of hospital stay and chronic pain due to incision after 2 months.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • undergoing upper abdominal surgery
  • ASA(American Society of Anesthesiology)1-2
Exclusion Criteria
  • denial of patient or parents
  • infection on the local anesthetic application area
  • infection in the central nervous system
  • coagulopathy
  • brain tumors
  • known allergy against local anesthetics
  • anatomical difficulties
  • with preexisting cardiac dysfunction
  • with history of renal and/or hepatic dysfunction

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Erector Spinae Plane BlockBupivacaine 0.5 ml/kgUS-guided erector spinae plane block with 0.5 ml/kg 0.25% Bupivacaine
Caudal BlockBupivacaine 0.7 ml/kgUS-guided caudal block with 0.7 ml/kg 0.25% Bupivacaine
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale/Visual Analog scaleup to 48 hours

Pain scores between 0-10

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time to first analgesicup to 48 hours

Duration of postoperative analgesia

Incidence of side effects/complicationsup to first week

hematoma, dural puncture, infections

Time to first mobilizationup to 48 hours

time to first mobilization

Presence of pain (chronic pain - Visual Analog scale>3)3 months

Chronic pain due to incision after 2-3 months

length of hospital staythrough study completion, an average of 1 week

hospitalisation

number patients who require rescue analgesicup to 48 hours

number of patients who require IV morphine (0.03 mg/kg) during the first 2 hours and paracetamol in the 48 hours

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Istanbul University

🇹🇷

Istanbul, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath