Optimizing the Management of Patients With Oral Therapy

Not Applicable

Terminated

Brief Summary: Oral anticancer treatments account a quarter of cancer treatments. These oral treatments are allowed at home, avoid hospitalization and limit the use of central venous routes. Oral treatments cause many side effects and patients are reluctant to report them because they are afraid that their treatment will be changed. But when these side effects are poorly managed, they can reduce adherence to treatment.

The main hypothesis of this randomized study is that the combination of an initial consultation with a trio (nurse, doctor, pharmacist) and a weekly telephone nurse follow-up during the administration of oral anticancer treatments decreases the rate and duration of side effects.

The main objective is to evaluate the impact at 3 months of a optimized management by an initial consultation with a trio nurse, doctor, pharmacist and a weekly nurse telephone follow-up versus a standard management on the level of digestive, skin and mucosal side effects of grade 3 in patients with oral chemotherapy.

This randomized study is realized in patients with kidney or breast cancer.

Detailed Description: Oral anticancer treatments account a quarter of cancer treatments. These oral treatments are allowed at home, avoid hospitalization and limit the use of central venous routes. Oral treatments cause many adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, digestive disorders, skin and mucous ...) that can significantly impact the quality of life. Patients are reluctant to report side effects because they are afraid that their treatment will be changed. But if these side effects are poorly managed, they can reduce adherence to treatment. The majority of devices are evaluated post-treatment and none relates to the treatment administration period.

The main hypothesis of this randomized study is that the combination of an initial consultation with a trio (nurse, doctor, pharmacist) and a weekly telephone nurse follow-up during the administration of treatments decreases the rate and duration of digestive, cutaneous and mucosal side effects.

The main objective is to evaluate the impact at 3 months of a optimized management by an initial consultation with a trio nurse, doctor, pharmacist and a weekly nurse telephone follow-up versus a standard management on the level of digestive, skin and mucosal side effects of grade 3 in patients with oral chemotherapy (Xeloda® or Sutent®).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria

Patient over 18 years old.
Men or women with kidney cancer treated with Sutent® chemotherapy (Cohort 1) according to the following schedule: 42-day course: 28 days of treatment + 14 days of break therapeutic)
Women with breast cancer treated with Xeloda® (Cohort 2) chemotherapy according to the following schedule: 21-day course: 14 days of treatment + 7 days of therapeutic break).
Patient (e) able to understand French read, write, speak.
Patient who received information about the study.
Written and signed consent.
Affiliation to a social security scheme.
Patient reachable by phone.

Exclusion Criteria

Patient under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice.
Patient with severe mental retardation impairing comprehension abilities.
Impossibility of submitting to the medical follow-up of the test.
If hospitalized at the time of inclusion: hospitalization forecast greater than 1 week.

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
accented follow-up	managment of oral therapy	Initial consultation with a trio oncologist / pharmacist / nurse; weekly telephone follow-up with a nurse between each treatment and follow-up visit with the oncologist at each renewal of treatment.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Rate of side effects	6 months	Side effects evaluated: digestive, cutaneous and mucosal grade 3 and 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method

Receive instant email notifications about changes in this clinical trial

Receive instant email notifications about changes in this clinical trial